What Constitutes Insurance Bad Faith in Catastrophic Injury Cases
Common examples of bad faith in catastrophic injury cases include unreasonably denying valid claims, failing to conduct adequate investigations, misrepresenting policy provisions, delaying claim processing without justification, and offering settlements that are far below the actual value of the claim. When dealing with catastrophic injuries that result in permanent disability, extensive medical needs, or life-altering consequences, insurance companies have a heightened duty to handle claims promptly and fairly.
California Insurance Code Section 790.03 specifically prohibits unfair claims settlement practices, and violations can result in significant penalties for insurance companies. If your catastrophic injury claim has been denied or undervalued, you may have grounds for a bad faith lawsuit in addition to your underlying injury claim, potentially recovering damages far exceeding your original policy limits.
Common Bad Faith Tactics Used Against Catastrophic Injury Victims
Another frequent bad faith practice is the selective investigation, where insurance adjusters focus only on evidence that supports claim denial while ignoring medical records, expert opinions, and witness statements that support the claim. Insurance companies may also demand unnecessary medical examinations by their own doctors, who are often biased toward finding that injuries are less severe than they actually are. In catastrophic injury cases involving workplace accidents or serious car crashes, insurers may wrongly claim that pre-existing conditions caused the injuries rather than the accident.
Lowball settlement offers are perhaps the most blatant form of bad faith. Insurance companies know that catastrophic injury victims face mounting medical bills, lost income, and urgent financial pressures. They exploit this vulnerability by offering settlements that cover only a fraction of the victim's actual damages, hoping the victim will accept out of desperation. These initial offers rarely account for future medical costs, long-term care needs, permanent disability, or the full extent of pain and suffering associated with life-changing injuries.
The Two-Year Statute of Limitations and Bad Faith Claims
This distinction is crucial because insurance bad faith often doesn't become apparent until after you've filed a claim and the insurance company has had time to investigate and respond. If your insurer denies your catastrophic injury claim or engages in unreasonable delay tactics, the statute of limitations for your bad faith claim may not start running until that denial or delay occurs. However, you should never wait to consult with an attorney, as gathering evidence and building a strong case takes time.
It's important to note that if you're pursuing a bad faith claim against your own insurance company (first-party bad faith), the timeline may differ from a claim against a third party's insurer (third-party bad faith). Working with experienced California catastrophic injury attorneys ensures that all applicable deadlines are met and that your rights are fully protected throughout the claims process.
First-Party vs. Third-Party Bad Faith Claims
Third-party bad faith involves the at-fault party's insurance company. For example, if you were injured in a truck accident and the trucking company's insurer refuses to offer a reasonable settlement despite clear liability and catastrophic injuries, you may have a third-party bad faith claim. California law recognizes that insurance companies owe duties not only to their own policyholders but also to injured third parties when handling liability claims. The landmark case of Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Superior Court established that third-party claimants can sue for bad faith under certain circumstances.
The damages available in first-party and third-party bad faith cases can differ significantly. First-party bad faith claims often allow for recovery of economic damages, emotional distress damages, and punitive damages designed to punish the insurer's misconduct. Third-party bad faith claims may be more limited but can still result in substantial compensation when insurance companies act egregiously in handling settlement negotiations for catastrophic injuries.
Documenting Bad Faith for Your Catastrophic Injury Claim
Save all correspondence from your insurance company, including claim denial letters, requests for additional information, and settlement offers. These documents often contain the insurer's stated reasons for their decisions, which can later be proven unreasonable or pretextual. Pay particular attention to any inconsistencies in the insurer's position or explanations that change over time. For catastrophic injury cases, also maintain comprehensive medical records, bills, and documentation of all treatments, therapies, and medical equipment needs.
Consider keeping a personal journal documenting how the insurance company's delays or denials have affected your life, medical treatment, and financial situation. This can provide powerful evidence of the harm caused by bad faith practices. If your insurer's conduct has forced you to delay necessary medical procedures, forgo treatments, or experience increased pain and suffering, document these consequences thoroughly. Your personal injury attorney can use this documentation to demonstrate the full impact of the insurer's bad faith conduct.
How Insurance Companies Evaluate Catastrophic Injury Claims
Insurance adjusters are trained to use various tools and databases to value claims, but these systems often undervalue catastrophic injuries by relying on average settlement amounts rather than the unique circumstances of each case. When an insurer refuses to deviate from computer-generated valuations despite clear evidence that your injuries are more severe or your damages are higher than average, this may constitute bad faith. The insurer's duty is to evaluate your specific claim based on its individual merits, not to apply one-size-fits-all formulas.
Red flags that suggest improper claim evaluation include: refusing to consider medical evidence from your treating physicians, relying solely on independent medical examinations by insurance-friendly doctors, ignoring expert testimony about future medical needs, failing to account for non-economic damages like pain and suffering, and not considering the full impact of permanent disability on your earning capacity. If you're dealing with injuries from motorcycle crashes, pedestrian accidents, or other serious incidents, the evaluation should reflect the catastrophic nature of your injuries.
Damages Available in Insurance Bad Faith Lawsuits
Non-economic damages for bad faith can include compensation for emotional distress, anxiety, and mental anguish caused by the insurance company's conduct. When you're already dealing with the trauma of a catastrophic injury and the insurer adds to your suffering through unreasonable delays or denials, California law recognizes that this causes additional harm deserving of compensation. Courts have awarded substantial emotional distress damages in cases where insurers' bad faith tactics caused victims to lose homes, file bankruptcy, or suffer severe psychological harm.
Perhaps most significantly, California law allows for punitive damages in bad faith cases when the insurance company's conduct was malicious, oppressive, or fraudulent. Punitive damages are designed to punish the wrongdoer and deter similar conduct in the future. In catastrophic injury cases where insurers have acted with conscious disregard for the policyholder's rights, punitive damage awards can be substantial, sometimes reaching millions of dollars. These damages send a clear message that insurance companies cannot profit from treating catastrophic injury victims unfairly.
The Role of Expert Witnesses in Bad Faith Cases
Medical experts are equally important in catastrophic injury bad faith cases. Your treating physicians can testify about the severity of your injuries, the necessity of recommended treatments, and your long-term prognosis. When an insurance company has relied on biased independent medical examinations to deny your claim, your own medical experts can refute those findings and establish the true extent of your injuries. For complex cases involving traumatic brain injuries or spinal cord damage, multiple medical specialists may be needed to fully explain your condition and future needs.
Economic experts and life care planners are essential for demonstrating the full financial impact of catastrophic injuries and proving that the insurance company's settlement offers were unreasonably low. These experts can calculate lifetime medical costs, lost earning capacity, the need for ongoing care and assistance, and other economic damages that extend far into the future. Their testimony helps establish that the insurance company knew or should have known that their valuation of your claim was inadequate, supporting your bad faith allegations.
When to File a Bad Faith Lawsuit vs. Continuing Negotiations
However, some insurance companies only respond to actual litigation. If your insurer has repeatedly demonstrated bad faith through unreasonable denials, lowball offers, or unjustified delays, and negotiations have reached an impasse, filing a lawsuit may be necessary to protect your rights. This is particularly true in catastrophic injury cases where the stakes are high and the insurance company has significant financial incentive to minimize its payout. The discovery process in litigation can uncover internal insurance company documents and communications that reveal bad faith practices.
Timing is critical because you want to preserve all your legal options while also securing the compensation you need for your catastrophic injuries. Your catastrophic injury attorney will evaluate factors such as the strength of your bad faith evidence, the severity of your injuries, your immediate financial needs, and the likelihood of success in litigation. In some cases, it may be strategic to resolve the underlying injury claim first and then pursue bad faith damages separately, while in other situations, both claims should be pursued simultaneously.
How California Law Protects Catastrophic Injury Victims from Bad Faith
California courts have also developed robust case law protecting policyholders and injured parties from insurance bad faith. The landmark case of Comunale v. Traders & General Insurance Co. established that insurers owe a duty of good faith and fair dealing to their policyholders, and breach of this duty can result in tort liability beyond simple contract damages. Subsequent cases have expanded these protections and clarified the standards for proving bad faith in various contexts, including catastrophic injury claims.
The California Department of Insurance provides additional oversight and consumer protection. If you believe your insurance company is acting in bad faith, you can file a complaint with the Department, which may investigate and take enforcement action. While this doesn't replace the need for legal representation in pursuing your individual claim, it can add pressure on insurers to change their practices. For victims of rideshare accidents, bicycle crashes, or other incidents involving catastrophic injuries, these multiple layers of protection are essential for ensuring fair treatment.
Working with Attorneys Who Specialize in Bad Faith Claims
A skilled bad faith attorney will conduct a thorough investigation of your claim, including obtaining your complete claim file from the insurance company through discovery. This file often contains internal communications, claim notes, and decision-making documents that reveal the insurer's true motivations and whether they conducted a reasonable investigation. Your attorney should also have relationships with qualified expert witnesses who can testify about insurance industry standards and the unreasonableness of the insurer's conduct in your case.
Many catastrophic injury attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you don't pay attorney fees unless they recover compensation for you. This arrangement makes it possible for victims to pursue bad faith claims even when they're facing financial hardship due to their injuries. When evaluating potential attorneys, consider their resources, reputation, and willingness to take your case to trial if necessary. Insurance companies are more likely to make fair settlement offers when they know your attorney has the experience and resources to win at trial. Visit our contact page to schedule a free consultation with experienced California catastrophic injury attorneys who can evaluate your potential bad faith claim.
Preventing Insurance Bad Faith: Steps to Protect Yourself
Read your insurance policy carefully and understand what coverage you have, what exclusions apply, and what obligations you have as a policyholder. Many bad faith disputes arise from misunderstandings about policy terms, so knowing your coverage is essential. If you're dealing with injuries from car accidents or other incidents, review both your own insurance policies and any applicable third-party coverage. Keep copies of all policy documents, declarations pages, and endorsements in a safe place.
Consider hiring an attorney early in the claims process, especially for catastrophic injuries that will result in substantial damages. Having legal representation from the beginning sends a message to the insurance company that you're serious about protecting your rights and that their conduct will be scrutinized. An attorney can handle communications with the insurer, ensuring that nothing you say is misinterpreted or used against you. They can also identify bad faith red flags early and take action to document and address them before they escalate. Check our client testimonials and case results to see how we've helped other catastrophic injury victims secure fair compensation.