Review five public result references attributed to independent attorney Armen Akaragian and published by Mardirossian Akaragian LLP. Hurt Advice did not handle or obtain these outcomes and does not use them to predict another claim.
Use results for
Context, not promises
Value drivers
Proof, coverage, venue
Next step
Compare facts before intake
Attorney advertising result notice: Each result below depended on the facts of that case. Results will differ when based on different facts. Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict another outcome.
All five records currently qualify through public pages published by Mardirossian Akaragian LLP and connected to attorney Armen Akaragian. The amounts and descriptions below are careful summaries of those sources, not Hurt Advice recoveries.
Source-published amount
Published appellate opinion names Armen among Pannu’s counsel and affirms the $21,654,000 product liability judgment entered after a bench trial.
Attributed attorney: Armen Akaragian
Publishing firm: Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
California Court of Appeal published opinion · Source checked 2026-10-01
Open original public sourceSource-published amount
Official attorney bio says the wrongful death/products liability verdict led to recovery exceeding $13,000,000 including costs and interest.
Attributed attorney: Armen Akaragian
Publishing firm: Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
Mardirossian Akaragian LLP attorney biography · Source checked 2026-08-24
Open original public sourceSource-published amount
Official attorney bio lists this 2018 wrongful death police-shooting settlement for the family of Frank Mendoza Sr.
Attributed attorney: Armen Akaragian
Publishing firm: Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
Mardirossian Akaragian LLP attorney biography · Source checked 2026-08-24
Open original public sourceSource-published amount
The published appellate opinion records a $1,651,702.39 damages award after a bench trial; the firm says the defendant later paid over $2,650,000 after appeal.
Attributed attorney: Armen Akaragian
Publishing firm: Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
Mardirossian Akaragian LLP attorney biography · Source checked 2026-08-24
Open original public sourceSource-published amount
Official attorney bio lists this electric motorcycle injury verdict and notes Top Verdict later named it among California Top 100 verdicts for 2022.
Attributed attorney: Armen Akaragian
Publishing firm: Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
Mardirossian Akaragian LLP case page · Source checked 2026-08-24
Open original public sourceCase results are useful when they help you understand the range of factors that move value, not when they are treated like a shortcut calculator. Injury severity, long-term treatment, liability disputes, insurance limits, and venue can all change the picture. Pair these examples with the settlement-factor resource and the relevant practice area pages before using them as a point of comparison for your own claim.
Result-source review
Published settlements and verdicts can help frame the questions that influence serious injury outcomes, but the number alone is not an analysis. A responsible comparison begins with the named source, attorney or firm, jurisdiction, date, procedural posture, injury description, liability evidence, available coverage, costs, liens, and whether the figure is gross or net of deductions.
Confirm that the page identifies the attorney or firm associated with the result and that the external material supports the amount and matter description. Treat a marketing summary as secondary to a court, firm, or other identified public record.
A settlement reflects a negotiated resolution; a verdict reflects a factfinder decision and may later be reduced, appealed, paid differently, or affected by limits and offsets. Do not compare the labels as though they describe the same process.
Compare liability, causation, treatment, permanency, wage proof, future care, policy limits, defendants, venue, expert evidence, litigation timing, and liens. The closest dollar amount may be less informative than the closest evidence pattern.
Hurt Advice publishes educational and attorney-advertising references. The independent attorney or law firm named in a source is the relevant professional entity; Hurt Advice does not claim that it obtained the result.
Important boundary: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Nothing on the result page establishes claim value, case acceptance, attorney assignment, or an attorney-client relationship for a visitor.
Compare educational scenarios
Study evidence patterns without treating examples as predictions.
Inventory loss categories
Use a tool to organize questions, not promise a value.
Verify participating attorneys
Review published profiles and official license records.
Read the citation method
See how primary and secondary source roles are separated.
Results interpretation
To understand what may drive case value, compare injury severity, treatment continuity, liability clarity, insurance coverage, venue, witness proof, and whether future care or lost income can be documented. The number matters less than the facts that made the number possible.
Continue with the guidance that matches the evidence, medical care, claim type, or attorney background you need to evaluate before a consultation.
Open the public source and confirm the attorney or firm, matter description, result type, and any limitations stated there. Hurt Advice does not convert an external result into its own recovery, and a missing source should be treated as a reason not to rely on the number.
The useful comparison is injury severity, treatment, future care, liability, insurance, venue, evidence, and litigation posture. Two matters with similar labels can produce very different outcomes, while a large result may involve facts that do not resemble a visitor's situation.
These are attorney-advertising references tied to participating attorneys or law firms. They are not guarantees, average values, offers, or proof that an attorney will accept a new matter. Individual review and a separate written agreement are required for representation.
Questions about published results
No. Hurt Advice is not a law firm and did not handle or obtain these outcomes. The five references currently shown are attributed to attorney Armen Akaragian and published by Mardirossian Akaragian LLP. Each card links to the original public source and Armen Akaragian's independent profile.
No. Each result depended on the facts of that case, and results will differ when based on different facts. Liability, injuries, treatment, insurance, defendants, venue, evidence, costs, liens, appeals, and many other circumstances can change an outcome.
A verdict is a decision by a judge or jury. A settlement is a negotiated resolution. A verdict can be appealed, reduced, or paid differently, while settlement terms may be confidential. The label and procedural posture should be confirmed in the linked source.
Open the original public source, confirm the named attorney or law firm, read the matter description and result type, and compare the source with the visible summary. The source label and most recent source-check date appear on every card.
No. Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship, assign an attorney, guarantee case acceptance, or promise an outcome. Representation begins only if an independent attorney and the prospective client enter a separate written agreement.
Share the basic facts with a Hurt Advice intake coordinator. Hurt Advice can organize routing information, but it does not evaluate claim value, accept a case, provide representation, or promise an outcome.
Request an intake review