In California, assault and battery are two distinct intentional torts, though they often occur together. Assault is the intentional act that creates a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. You don't have to be touched for assault to occur—the threat alone is enough. Battery, on the other hand, is the actual intentional and harmful or offensive physical contact. If someone swings at you and misses, that's assault. If the punch lands, that's battery.
Both assault and battery are considered intentional torts under California Civil Code Section 1708.5, which means the perpetrator deliberately engaged in conduct intended to cause harm. This is different from negligence-based personal injury claims like car accidents, where the defendant's carelessness caused injury. Because assault and battery are intentional acts, different legal standards and damage calculations apply.
Understanding this distinction is crucial because it affects how your case is evaluated, what evidence is needed, and what types of damages you can recover. California law allows victims to pursue both criminal charges through the district attorney and a separate civil lawsuit for monetary compensation. These are parallel but independent legal processes.