Abraham Chuljyan is the founding attorney of Ace Law Firm, P.C. in Sherman Oaks, California. The State Bar of California lists him as an active attorney under State Bar #288713, admitted on January 16, 2013. The same official record identifies Ace Law Firm, P.C. as his current firm, confirms the Sherman Oaks office address and phone number, and lists Personal Injury as a self-reported practice area. The State Bar notes that self-reported practice areas are not certifications or guarantees of experience, so this profile treats that listing as one public verification point rather than a ranking.
Ace Law Firm publicly identifies Chuljyan as its founding attorney and describes the firm as focused on personal injury law and litigation. Its current practice menu lists automobile, trucking, motorcycle, slip-and-fall, pedestrian, and rideshare accidents. Those published categories support the scope shown on this profile. They do not establish that he accepts every matter, is available for a consultation, or has handled every factual variation within those categories. A prospective client should confirm fit, conflicts, fees, and who would perform the work directly with the independent law firm.
His official firm biography reports that he earned a bachelor's degree from the University of California, Los Angeles in Political Science and Latin American Studies. It also reports that he participated in exchange programs in Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Chile from 2002 through 2004, then worked as an educator in inner-city Los Angeles before attending law school. He earned his J.D. from the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law in 2009. The California State Bar independently lists the University of Detroit School of Law as his law school, and Super Lawyers also lists the 2009 J.D.
If you are evaluating a motorcycle accident case, compare Abraham's documented role, local relevance, and public background with the facts of your claim.
Before contacting the firm, review who Abraham is, which professional details are publicly supported, how the listed background relates to this claim type, and which questions still need to be answered directly.
If the case still needs more context before a consultation, move through the related legal guidance below. That path usually gives readers a better picture of deadlines, evidence priorities, and how a California personal injury claim may evolve after the first intake call.