attorney background and case preparation
Premises Liability Attorney Abraham Chuljyan
What facts and records matter when evaluating Abraham Chuljyan for a California premises-liability or slip-and-fall claim?
Guidance updated . View the full profile below for licensing details, separately dated source checks, and background.
Primary identity record
Learn more about Abraham Chuljyan
This is a focused supporting page. Use Abraham Chuljyan's full sourced attorney profile as the primary identity record for biography, role, languages, office information, and public-record links. Review that profile alongside the issue-specific preparation and public sources below.
The State Bar record lists Abraham Chuljyan as an active California attorney, State Bar #288713. Hurt Advice is a separate referral and legal information service, not the attorney's law firm.
Direct answer
Key questions for this type of case
A California premises claim may turn on who owned, leased, occupied, or controlled the location; what condition created the risk; how long it existed; which inspections or warnings occurred; and how the condition caused the injury. Review Abraham Chuljyan's verified license and firm role, then confirm his directly relevant experience and who would handle the matter. Bring photographs, witness information, incident reports, medical records, and any written request to preserve surveillance footage so counsel can evaluate the available proof and remaining gaps.
Abraham Chuljyan's background and this legal issue
Ace Law Firm identifies Abraham Chuljyan as its founding attorney and expressly lists slip-and-fall accidents among the firm's practice areas. His active State Bar record and published personal injury listing provide separate identity and license verification.
California process context
A California premises review usually begins with the exact location, control of the property, notice of the condition, and causation. Judicial Council CACI No. 1000 identifies ownership, lease, occupancy or control, negligent use or maintenance, harm, and substantial-factor causation as core factual elements. Preserve incident reports, surveillance requests, photographs, maintenance records, witness contacts, footwear, and medical chronology before conditions or records change.
Evidence to organize
Evidence 1
Wide and close photographs of the condition and surrounding area
Evidence 2
Incident report, employee names, witness contacts, and statements made
Evidence 3
Surveillance locations and a dated written preservation request
Evidence 4
Inspection, cleaning, maintenance, repair, and prior-complaint records
Evidence 5
Medical chronology connecting symptoms and treatment to the incident
Questions to decide the next step
Who controlled the area where the injury occurred?
Ownership alone may not answer control; leases, maintenance contracts, vendors, tenants, and public entities can affect which records and parties require investigation.
Record to bring: Address, business name, lease clues, receipts, and property-management contacts
How can the dangerous condition and notice be shown?
The condition, its duration, inspection practices, complaints, warnings, and employee observations can be central to whether reasonable care was used.
Record to bring: Time-stamped photos, video requests, witness details, warnings, and incident reports
Did any government entity control the property?
Public property can involve different claim-presentation procedures and shorter deadlines, so the property owner and operator should be identified early rather than assumed.
Record to bring: Location records, agency signage, public-maintenance requests, and ownership research
Important service information
Hurt Advice is not a law firm
Understand what happens when you review a profile or submit an intake request.
Open complete directoryClose complete directoryImportant disclosure
Hurt Advice is a lawyer referral and legal information service, not a law firm. The information above comes from the public sources linked here. The listed professional may not have reviewed it, and viewing the information or submitting a request does not establish availability, case acceptance, or an attorney-client relationship.