Skip to main content
Free consultationES
California traffic safety data

California Accident Statistics by City

Compare crash totals, fatality rates, and city-level danger patterns across 48 California markets using the latest available statewide dataset from 2024.

Browse city dataSee highest-risk cities
48 city profiles2024 statewide data yearAlphabet jump rail below

Use the hub by question

Start with the smallest surface that answers the question.

Use the rankings for a fast statewide comparison, then move to the city directory when you know the local market you need. If the crash is already active and the next move depends on treatment, deadlines, or insurer pressure, use case review instead of staying in research mode.

Fastest browse path

Compare fatality rates or total crashes first, then drop into the city profile that matches the local question you are researching.

When to stop browsing

Accident data adds context. It does not answer liability, deadline, or insurer-strategy questions for a live case.

Compare risk

Start with the highest fatality-rate cities.

Use this ranking first when you want the fastest statewide read on where serious crash outcomes run highest.

Jump to fatality rankings

Compare volume

See which cities carry the most total crashes.

Use the crash-volume table when the question is how often collisions happen in the state’s busiest local markets.

Jump to crash totals

Find your city

Go straight to the full city directory.

Use the alphabet rail when you already know the market you need and want the detailed local profile fast.

Browse city profiles

Call now: (818) 482-2260Start secure intake

Why people trust this step

The data helps with local context, but a live case usually needs action before more browsing.

If medical treatment, an insurer statement, or a filing deadline is already driving the next move, call or start intake instead of comparing more cities.

All resource hubsCalifornia accident guide
Browse rankings first for statewide contextUse city profiles for roads, intersections, and crash volumeMove to intake if the case is already active
Fatality rankingsCrash totalsCity directoryStatewide factsFAQ

Start with rankings when you want statewide context, then use the city directory once you know where to drill down.

Highest fatality rates

Start here when the question is where crash outcomes run most severe.

Fatality-rate comparisons help readers quickly identify cities where the crash environment trends deadlier relative to population, not just busier.

#1

Victorville

San Bernardino County

20.8

fatalities per 100K residents

2,280 total crashes28 fatal crashes
#2

San Bernardino

San Bernardino County

18.9

fatalities per 100K residents

4,120 total crashes42 fatal crashes
#3

Lancaster

Los Angeles County

18.4

fatalities per 100K residents

2,680 total crashes32 fatal crashes
#4

Palmdale

Los Angeles County

17.7

fatalities per 100K residents

2,580 total crashes30 fatal crashes
#5

Modesto

Stanislaus County

17.4

fatalities per 100K residents

3,580 total crashes38 fatal crashes
#6

Bakersfield

Kern County

16.9

fatalities per 100K residents

6,120 total crashes68 fatal crashes
#7

Stockton

San Joaquin County

16.2

fatalities per 100K residents

4,890 total crashes52 fatal crashes
#8

Moreno Valley

Riverside County

16

fatalities per 100K residents

3,280 total crashes34 fatal crashes
#9

Visalia

Tulare County

15.6

fatalities per 100K residents

2,080 total crashes22 fatal crashes
#10

Fontana

San Bernardino County

14.9

fatalities per 100K residents

3,420 total crashes32 fatal crashes

Highest total crashes

Use this ranking when the local question is pure crash volume.

Total-crash comparisons show where accident frequency stays highest, which is useful when you want a quick read on the busiest urban collision environments.

#1

Los Angeles

Los Angeles County

55,234

reported total crashes

18,420 injury crashes7.5/100K fatality rate
#2

San Diego

San Diego County

15,890

reported total crashes

5,280 injury crashes6.4/100K fatality rate
#3

San Jose

Santa Clara County

11,450

reported total crashes

3,890 injury crashes6.1/100K fatality rate
#4

San Francisco

San Francisco County

8,920

reported total crashes

3,100 injury crashes3.5/100K fatality rate
#5

Fresno

Fresno County

7,890

reported total crashes

2,650 injury crashes10.7/100K fatality rate
#6

Sacramento

Sacramento County

7,450

reported total crashes

2,480 injury crashes9.1/100K fatality rate
#7

Long Beach

Los Angeles County

6,780

reported total crashes

2,280 injury crashes9/100K fatality rate
#8

Bakersfield

Kern County

6,120

reported total crashes

2,050 injury crashes16.9/100K fatality rate
#9

Oakland

Alameda County

5,890

reported total crashes

1,980 injury crashes10.4/100K fatality rate
#10

Anaheim

Orange County

4,980

reported total crashes

1,680 injury crashes9.1/100K fatality rate

City directory

Browse all California city accident profiles without scanning one long wall.

The directory below is built for local research. Pick a letter, then open the city profile for dangerous roads, intersections, and crash-type breakdowns in that market.

Fastest mobile path: use the alphabet rail first, then open the city card that matches your market instead of scrolling through the full statewide list.
ABCEFGHILMOPRSTV

Statewide context

California Traffic Safety Facts

Use the statewide totals below as context for the city rankings. They show how large the overall California crash environment is before you narrow the research to one local market.

485,000
Total crashes (2024)
4,285
Traffic fatalities
1,100
Pedestrian fatalities
+2.8%
Year-over-year change

Data compiled from California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), NHTSA FARS, and CHP SWITRS sources. This hub currently references the 2024 statewide dataset.

Data-backed next paths

Connect crash statistics to local claim guides that use the data.

This keeps the accident-statistics hub from being a dead-end data table. The priority links below move readers into exact city-service guides, value tools, and case-action paths.

Connect data to priority local guides

These first-batch local guides need crawl paths from factual resource pages, not only the service sitemap.

Priority guide

Los Angeles Sideswipe Accidents

Use this local guide when the question needs exact city context, roadway facts, treatment proof, and next-step options instead of a statewide overview.

Priority guide

San Diego Sideswipe Accidents

Use this local guide when the question needs exact city context, roadway facts, treatment proof, and next-step options instead of a statewide overview.

Priority guide

San Francisco Sideswipe Accidents

Use this local guide when the question needs exact city context, roadway facts, treatment proof, and next-step options instead of a statewide overview.

Compare another claim lane in the same evidence family

Sideswipe and lane-change pages are the first service-city quality sprint because they can be differentiated by roads, witnesses, photos, and insurer fault arguments.

Priority guide

San Jose Sideswipe Accidents

Use this local guide when the question needs exact city context, roadway facts, treatment proof, and next-step options instead of a statewide overview.

Priority guide

Sacramento Sideswipe Accidents

Use this local guide when the question needs exact city context, roadway facts, treatment proof, and next-step options instead of a statewide overview.

Priority guide

Long Beach Sideswipe Accidents

Use this local guide when the question needs exact city context, roadway facts, treatment proof, and next-step options instead of a statewide overview.

Move from statewide data to case action

City data should hand readers into a concrete legal guide, value tool, or intake path when the research turns into a live claim.

Value

Estimate damages after reviewing city data

Use the calculator when crash context needs to be translated into treatment costs, wage loss, and value questions.

Guide

Read the California car accident guide

Use the broad guide when the claim type is still unclear and the reader needs the main liability framework.

Action

Start a free case review

Move to intake when data, injuries, and insurer pressure are already tied to a real accident.

Accident statistics FAQ

Questions people ask before they move from research to action

These answers keep the page useful for research while making it clearer when the right next step is a guide, a city profile, or a case review.

How should I use city accident statistics after a crash?

Use the statewide rankings to understand local risk patterns, then open your city profile for dangerous roads, intersections, and crash-type context before you decide which guide or next step to read.

Does a high fatality rate automatically increase the value of a case?

No. City-level risk data helps frame local conditions, but claim value still depends on injuries, liability, treatment, insurance coverage, and the specific evidence in the case.

What makes this page different from a lawyer page?

This hub is a research surface first. It helps you compare cities and understand traffic-safety patterns. If the case is already active, deadlines or insurer pressure are usually a reason to stop browsing and start intake.

How current is the crash data on this page?

The hub is built around the latest available statewide dataset in this repo, which is currently labeled 2024.

Need help after reviewing the data?

Use the statistics for context. Use case review for the next move.

City crash data can help explain the local environment, but it cannot answer who is liable, what coverage applies, or how to handle the insurer. If the case is already active, call or start secure intake now.

Call now: (818) 482-2260Start secure intake

Why people trust this step

Keep the research path available, but do not let a live claim stall inside the data.

You can always come back to the city profiles later. The higher-risk mistake is waiting too long on treatment, statements, or filing deadlines.

Back to statewide dataAll resource hubs