San Bernardino County, California

Fontana Accident Statistics

Name: Hurt Advice
Address: 16101 Ventura Blvd, Suite 334, Encino, CA, 91436, US
Telephone: (818) 482-2260
Location: Hurt Advice Customer-Facing Staffed Office

Fontana's warehouse district generates significant truck traffic. The I-10/I-15 interchange is a major accident hotspot. Use this Fontana car accident statistics page to understand local crash volume, dangerous corridors, source notes, and when the data should lead to legal next steps.

Call (818) 482-2260 Start secure intake

Why people trust this step

Use the Fontana data for context. Use case review when the claim is active.

If treatment, an insurance call, or a deadline is already in motion, the next move is evidence strategy rather than more browsing.

Fontana car accident guide Jump to data snapshot

3,420 total crashes1,150 injury crashes14.9/100K fatality rate

Overview Crash types Danger zones How to use data FAQ Case review

Published by Hurt Advice Editorial Team

Editorially checked; no attorney review is claimed.

Last updated July 5, 2026

Our editorial standards

Local evidence mapReviewed August 9, 2026

Fontana: records, analysis, and relevant profiles for crash-data evidence review

For crash-data evidence review in Fontana, this section connects the scene near Victoria Gardens, the San Antonio Regional Hospital chronology, and official-process questions associated with San Bernardino Justice Center. It also shows sources and bar-verified attorney profiles, but it does not replace investigation, diagnosis, or individualized legal advice; cross-check the statement against the timestamped record to limit the conclusion to verified facts.

How to use this evidence guide

1. Start with City of Fontana Police Department and confirm who controls the first missing record.
2. Compare Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy near Victoria Gardens with San Antonio Regional Hospital before treating local context as incident proof.
3. Use the verified profiles for Raffi Naljian and Abraham Chuljyan only to review published license and practice information; no attorney has been assigned.

Official local record brief

Start with the right custodian and record

City of Fontana Police Department publishes collision investigation and traffic-report access guidance; here it is connected with Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy near Victoria Gardens, and the visible limit controls what may be concluded.

Official processCollision investigation and traffic-report access guidance

Fontana Police Traffic Unit and collision-report access

City of Fontana Police Department

The city explains the Traffic Unit's collision-investigation role, major-accident team, report-access process, required request details, and expected processing window. On this page, the record helps separate Fontana public context from incident-specific proof and the San Antonio Regional Hospital chronology; trace the reported fact against the original document to check who controlled the evidence.

When to use it

Use this page after confirming Fontana Police investigated the event and an eligible requester needs the collision report, processing guidance, or the correct Traffic Unit contact; map the record request against the responsible custodian to test one unresolved fact.

Details used to locate the record

Report number if available
collision date and location
requester and involved-party details

Limit: This page explains agency responsibilities and record access; it is not a citywide crash count and does not establish what happened or who was legally responsible; for this crash-data evidence review page, compare the published scope with Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy and the San Antonio Regional Hospital chronology before applying it to the incident.

Local anchors and boundaries

What can guide the record search, and what it does not prove

Scene anchor

Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy near Victoria Gardens

Use the direction, lane, crossing, time, and observed conditions to identify reports, cameras, and witnesses connected with Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy; trace the source statement against the supporting record to tie the request to a named source.

Boundary: Victoria Gardens is a geographic reference; it does not establish where an incident occurred or who was at fault; review the reported fact against the original document to show what needs confirmation.

First-care record

San Antonio Regional Hospital

Compare triage, imaging, referrals, restrictions, and billing from San Antonio Regional Hospital with the incident chronology; review the coverage position against the policy document to identify the next custodian.

Boundary: Naming San Antonio Regional Hospital does not confirm that a person received care there or that its records prove causation; cross-check the source scope against the supported conclusion to tie the request to a named source.

Official path

San Bernardino Justice Center

Confirm the entity, legal party names, and published process before using San Bernardino Justice Center for a filing or venue question; verify the treatment chronology against the provider record to distinguish context from proof.

Boundary: San Bernardino Justice Center is a research reference and does not establish venue, jurisdiction, or an individual deadline; trace the incident chronology against its supporting source to test whether independent records agree.

Local mobility

Omnitrans and Metrolink

Check whether agency, station, vehicle, or transfer records help place the sequence near Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy; trace the evidence gap against the available custodian list to mark the remaining gap.

Boundary: Omnitrans and Metrolink may identify an agency or movement record, but confirm the operator, time window, and record number before using it to describe this incident; document the record owner against the preservation step to limit the conclusion to verified facts.

Visual evidence flow

Connect each fact to its record, not an assumption

For this page, start at Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy near Victoria Gardens, compare the chronology tied to San Antonio Regional Hospital, and confirm whether City of Fontana Police Department controls collision investigation and traffic-report access guidance; the final step checks Raffi Naljian's published license without assigning representation.

01 / Scene
Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy near Victoria Gardens
Record the time, direction, lane, and possible camera or witness leads tied to Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy near Victoria Gardens.
02 / Care
San Antonio Regional Hospital
Compare first symptoms, triage, referrals, and restrictions in records associated with San Antonio Regional Hospital.
03 / Record
City of Fontana Police Department
Confirm whether City of Fontana Police Department controls collision investigation and traffic-report access guidance before requesting it.
04 / Review
Raffi Naljian
Check Raffi Naljian's published license and practice information; this path does not assign an attorney.

Decision path

From the scene to a documented review

01
Place the scene near Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy
Record direction, time, conditions, and the Victoria Gardens reference, then identify who controls the report, video, or physical record; review the unresolved question against the confirming record to test whether independent records agree.
02
Connect care from San Antonio Regional Hospital
Order symptoms, triage, diagnosis, imaging, referrals, and restrictions by date without assuming one note resolves causation; verify the source scope against the supported conclusion to check who controlled the evidence.
03
Preserve the crash-data evidence review evidence
Build one chronology that separates scene proof, medical proof, insurance positions, and unresolved questions; track the Fontana Police Traffic Unit and collision-report access request to City of Fontana Police Department as requested, received, disputed, or still awaiting primary-source confirmation; reconcile the source statement against the supporting record to mark the remaining gap.
04
Confirm the process connected with San Bernardino Justice Center
Verify parties, public-entity involvement, venue, and dates through an official source or qualified attorney before relying on a general deadline; document the evidence sequence against the retention window to tie the request to a named source.

Investigating agency and camera custodian

Reconstruct the approach along Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy

On the Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy approach near Victoria Gardens, record direction, lane, crossing, time, and lighting. If first care began at San Antonio Regional Hospital, compare its intake time with dispatch, video, and movement data to identify who holds each missing record; cross-check the incident chronology against its supporting source to test whether independent records agree.

Next request: For this crash-data evidence review review, obtain the report number and preserve video, dispatch, photographs, and movement data before routine deletion cycles; document the treatment chronology against the provider record to limit the conclusion to verified facts.

Medical provider and records department

Connect the first care record from San Antonio Regional Hospital

For care attributed to San Antonio Regional Hospital, separate triage, diagnosis, imaging, referrals, restrictions, billing, and symptom changes. The San Antonio Regional Hospital chart does not prove causation by itself; it shows which dates and changes still need qualified review; reconcile the scene fact against the preserved record to mark the remaining gap.

Next request: Request the complete San Antonio Regional Hospital chart and keep a dated list of missing, corrected, or later-added records; review the local signal against the source boundary to identify the next custodian.

Court, city, county, or public entity

Check control and venue around San Bernardino Justice Center

For a filing or public-entity question linked to San Bernardino Justice Center, first identify who controlled the scene or key record. Confirm the official path associated with San Bernardino Justice Center before assuming the ordinary filing period resolves a possible public-claim notice; map the reported fact against the original document to separate assumptions from documented facts.

Next request: Identify the potential defendant, then use the published court or agency path associated with San Bernardino Justice Center before waiting; review the page claim against primary evidence to distinguish context from proof.

Crash-data evidence review specialist record holder

Preserve the evidence that makes this incident type different

For crash-data evidence review in Fontana, the focused review should include scene photographs, collision report, witness contacts, vehicle damage, insurance communications, first medical notes, referrals, bills, and work restrictions. Compare that file with the first-care chronology from San Antonio Regional Hospital and any venue question involving San Bernardino Justice Center; the central unresolved issue is whether the physical record, witness sequence, medical chronology, and available coverage support the same account of what happened; verify the source scope against the supported conclusion to distinguish context from proof.

Next request: Build one chronology that separates scene proof, medical proof, insurance positions, and unresolved questions for the file connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; trace the coverage position against the policy document to test whether independent records agree.

Local data classification

Editorial estimate

Hurt Advice's illustrative city model lists 3,420 crashes for Fontana, including 1,150 injury crashes and 32 fatal crashes.

This figure is a Hurt Advice editorial model, not an official agency extract or proof of fault, block-level frequency, or claim value.

Evidence priorities

Preserve incident, camera, or business footage near Auto Club Speedway, Victoria Gardens
Lock in EMS and intake records from Kaiser Permanente Fontana and Fontana Medical Center
Track witness movement and vehicle data on corridors like I-10, I-15
Tie liability themes to local causes such as Speeding, Truck Accidents
scene photographs, collision report, witness contacts, vehicle damage, insurance communications, first medical notes, referrals, bills, and work restrictions
Build one chronology that separates scene proof, medical proof, insurance positions, and unresolved questions.

Claim pressure points to verify

Heavy movement through I-10, I-15
Recurring danger at intersections such as Sierra Ave & Foothill, Cherry Ave & Baseline
Higher claim pressure during 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM, 3:30 PM - 6:00 PM
whether the physical record, witness sequence, medical chronology, and available coverage support the same account of what happened

Analysis before conclusions

After reviewing the published profile against the official license, what should be documented first for an incident near Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy?

Start with direction, lane, crossing, time, lighting, and the Victoria Gardens reference. Then connect those details with first care from San Antonio Regional Hospital and the custodian of each report, video, or record; verify the public record against its source limitation to mark the remaining gap.

After reviewing the local signal against the source boundary, how should the local data be used?

Hurt Advice's illustrative city model lists 3,420 crashes for Fontana, including 1,150 injury crashes and 32 fatal crashes. This figure is a Hurt Advice editorial model, not an official agency extract or proof of fault, block-level frequency, or claim value; trace the scene fact against the preserved record to check who controlled the evidence.

After reviewing the source statement against the supporting record, why is an attorney profile matched here?

For crash-data evidence review in Fontana, this page links Raffi Naljian (published focus includes car accidents, rear end collision lawyer, head on collisions, t bone accidents, speeding accidents, distracted driving, rental car accidents); Abraham Chuljyan (published focus includes personal injury, car accidents) as comparison paths grounded in public profiles and license records; it does not imply assignment, availability, representation, or an outcome recommendation; reconcile the factual issue against the next available custodian to keep the chronology auditable.

After reviewing the coverage position against the policy document, how can the sequence between Victoria Gardens and San Antonio Regional Hospital be checked?

Compare the report, dispatch, photograph, or video time near Victoria Gardens with the first note from San Antonio Regional Hospital. A timing difference does not decide the matter, but it identifies which custodian or witness should clarify the sequence; trace the incident detail against the public source to identify the next custodian.

After reviewing the treatment chronology against the provider record, what must be confirmed before treating San Bernardino Justice Center as the venue reference?

Confirm the legal name of each potential party, who controlled Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, and whether a public entity was involved. San Bernardino Justice Center is a local reference; it does not establish venue, jurisdiction, or compliance with a notice requirement by itself; cross-check the incident chronology against its supporting source to test one unresolved fact.

After reviewing the record chronology against the chain of custody, what remains unresolved in the crash-data evidence review review?

The file should connect scene photographs, collision report, witness contacts, vehicle damage, insurance communications, first medical notes, referrals, bills, and work restrictions with the San Antonio Regional Hospital chronology and evidence preserved near Victoria Gardens. That comparison helps evaluate whether the physical record, witness sequence, medical chronology, and available coverage support the same account of what happened without turning local context into a legal conclusion; verify the claimed fact against the verifying document to preserve the original sequence.

After reviewing the factual issue against the next available custodian, which local legal issue needs review?

Claims in Fontana often turn on venue planning in San Bernardino County, especially when multiple responding agencies or public-property issues show up around corridors like I-10, I-15; map the page claim against primary evidence to show what needs confirmation.

After reviewing local context against incident-level proof, how should the local medical chronology be organized?

Treatment records often begin with providers such as Kaiser Permanente Fontana and Fontana Medical Center before moving into orthopedic, neuro, and pain-management care. Preserving that timeline is critical to proving damages in Fontana; cross-check the statement against the timestamped record to test whether independent records agree.

After reviewing the filing question against official authority, what connects the scene to the potential filing venue?

Review should compare witnesses, camera coverage, and treatment locations with filing venues near San Bernardino County Superior Court - Fontana and San Bernardino Justice Center, especially for crashes tied to Auto Club Speedway, Victoria Gardens and ZIP codes such as 92335, 92336, 92337; cross-check the timeline against independent corroboration to test one unresolved fact.

After reviewing the incident detail against the public source, what are this page's evidence priorities?

Preserve incident, camera, or business footage near Auto Club Speedway, Victoria Gardens; Lock in EMS and intake records from Kaiser Permanente Fontana and Fontana Medical Center; Track witness movement and vehicle data on corridors like I-10, I-15; Tie liability themes to local causes such as Speeding, Truck Accidents; document the claimed fact against the verifying document to test whether independent records agree.

After reviewing the evidence gap against the available custodian list, which local signals should be verified rather than assumed?

Heavy movement through I-10, I-15; Recurring danger at intersections such as Sierra Ave & Foothill, Cherry Ave & Baseline; Higher claim pressure during 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM, 3:30 PM - 6:00 PM; cross-check the scene fact against the preserved record to separate assumptions from documented facts.

Verified attorney relevance

Raffi Naljian

published focus includes car accidents, rear end collision lawyer, head on collisions, t bone accidents, speeding accidents, distracted driving, rental car accidents

California Bar #238919

Verified profile Official license record

Abraham Chuljyan

published focus includes personal injury, car accidents

California Bar #288713

Verified profile Official license record

No match guarantees assignment, representation, or results.

Primary source trail

City of Fontana Police Department: Fontana Police Traffic Unit and collision-report access
The city explains the Traffic Unit's collision-investigation role, major-accident team, report-access process, required request details, and expected processing window; on this page it locates the local record connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; document the scene fact against the preserved record to show what needs confirmation.
Limit: This page explains agency responsibilities and record access; it is not a citywide crash count and does not establish what happened or who was legally responsible; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
California Office of Traffic Safety crash rankings
Official city and county traffic-safety context, methodology, and limitations; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; compare the statement against the timestamped record to test one unresolved fact.
Limit: OTS rankings compare incorporated cities or counties and do not prove what happened at a particular scene; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
California Highway Patrol collision report request
Official instructions for eligible parties requesting a CHP collision report; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; reconcile the public record against its source limitation to test whether independent records agree.
Limit: This process applies to CHP reports and does not establish that CHP investigated a particular incident; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
California DMV accident reporting
Official SR-1 reporting information and required record fields; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; map the published profile against the official license to identify the next custodian.
Limit: An SR-1 is a reporting record, not a finding of fault or a substitute for a collision report; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Judicial Branch of California court finder
Official tool for locating the relevant county court and its public contact information; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; trace the source scope against the supported conclusion to check who controlled the evidence.
Limit: The court finder locates courts; it does not select venue or calculate a filing deadline for an individual matter; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1
Primary statutory text for the general two-year personal-injury action period; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; document the claimed fact against the verifying document to distinguish context from proof.
Limit: Exceptions, accrual rules, contract terms, public-entity claims, and other laws may change the applicable deadline; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
California Government Code section 911.2
Primary statutory text for specified claims presented to a public entity; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; verify the reported fact against the original document to tie the request to a named source.
Limit: The statute does not identify whether a defendant is a public entity or whether another presentation rule applies; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Hurt Advice citations and data-methodology disclosure
Site disclosure identifying editorial estimates, public-source families, and citation boundaries; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; document the source statement against the supporting record to check who controlled the evidence.
Limit: An editorial estimate is not an official agency extract and cannot prove incident-level frequency, fault, or claim value; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
State Bar of California attorney search
Official public source for checking a California attorney name, license number, and status; on this page it frames the investigation connecting Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy, San Antonio Regional Hospital, and San Bernardino Justice Center; compare the scene fact against the preserved record to mark the remaining gap.
Limit: A license record verifies public registration details; it does not establish case fit, availability, or likely outcome; for this crash-data evidence review issue in Fontana, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.

Browse the statewide local evidence source index

Answer-first city snapshot

Fontana car accident statistics, in plain English

Use this snapshot for a quick read on the local crash pattern or for practical record-gathering after a real collision. Broad city statistics provide context, but they do not prove fault in an individual crash.

Source trail and limits

Dataset year

2024

Latest illustrative statewide figures represented in this repository.

Source families

California OTS, NHTSA FARS, CHP SWITRS

Used as public-safety references for traffic crash, fatality, and roadway context.

Legal-use limit

Context, not a case value promise

City statistics support research and intake preparation; liability, damages, and settlement value still require case-specific proof.

Fontana car accident statistics

3,420

Fontana shows roughly 3,420 estimated crashes in our illustrative figures.

Use this number as local context, then move into the roads, injury records, insurer pressure, and evidence questions that explain a specific Fontana crash.

Injury signal

33.6%

1,150 crashes involved reported injuries.

For an active claim, the key question is whether medical timing, provider notes, work restrictions, and symptoms are organized clearly enough for review.

Fatality comparison

14.9/100K

The local fatality rate is 4.0 points above the statewide fatality rate.

That comparison helps explain local risk, but it does not prove fault or claim value. The individual file still depends on documents and coverage.

Questions this guide addresses

Start with the question closest to your situation

These paths separate broad traffic-safety information from case-specific next steps. The data gives local context; liability, damages, and deadlines still require the individual records.

Common question: How common are reported crashes in Fontana?

Fontana crash totals at a glance

Fontana has 3,420 estimated crashes in the illustrative 2024 figures, including 1,150 injury crashes and 32 fatal crashes.

Review the data snapshot

Common question: How many Fontana crashes involve injuries?

Crash totals, injury share, and fatality context

Use the 33.6% injury-crash share and 4.0 points above the statewide fatality rate fatality comparison as local context, not as a promise about liability, settlement value, or fault.

Compare crash types

Common question: Which Fontana roads and intersections need a closer look?

Road and intersection context for local proof

Start with Sierra Ave & Foothill and I-10 when the practical question is where evidence, witnesses, camera footage, or roadway records may be found.

Review danger zones

Common question: How should I use Fontana traffic data after a crash?

How to turn traffic data into next steps

The data helps organize scene proof, treatment timing, insurer questions, and coverage issues after a real collision in Fontana.

Use the data correctly

Common question: What if the other driver left the scene?

Coverage questions behind hit-and-run data

Hit-and-run crashes make up about 9.4% of the local dataset, so policy review, report timing, witness leads, and vehicle-identification evidence may matter quickly.

Open the local FAQ

Common question: When should I move from city data to an individual case review?

When statistics should lead to case review

If treatment, an adjuster call, or a deadline is already active, move from citywide data into a case-specific review path without treating broad statistics as legal advice.

Fontana car accident guide

Crash data overview

What the Fontana numbers actually show

The table turns the raw crash totals into practical context: severity, claim urgency, and where investigation usually starts after a local collision.

MetricValueWhy it matters

Population214,547San Bernardino County local market

Total crashes3,420Illustrative estimate of total local crashes

Injury crashes1,15033.6% of estimated crashes

Fatal crashes324.0 points above the statewide fatality rate

Hit-and-run crashes320Preserve vehicle, witness, and camera evidence quickly

Crash-type breakdown

visibility and lane-change claims

Open local guide

Local interpretation memo

What should a Fontana reader do with these numbers?

The data is most valuable when it helps a reader move from general research into a specific proof plan. These notes connect the Fontana statistics to scene records, medical documentation, and the next page that can answer a narrower question.

Let the crash count guide the first question

Fontana's 3,420 estimated crashes make the page useful only when the broad number leads back to the exact scene, the first medical visit, and the insurer contact that followed.

Use the road only if it clarifies custody

A corridor like I-10 can matter for speed, lane position, or visibility, but the legal task is preserving records before short retention windows close.

Use the local trend as a checklist

Speeding, Truck Accidents, and the 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM window can guide intake questions, but they do not decide fault. The useful next step is matching the pattern to photos, reports, and care records.

Danger zones

Intersections to watch

Sierra Ave & Foothill

Cherry Ave & Baseline

Citrus Ave & Valley Blvd

Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy

Roadway context

High-risk corridors

I-10I-15SR-210SR-66

Peak accident windows

6:30 AM - 8:30 AM

3:30 PM - 6:00 PM

Friday nights

Saturday nights

City-specific proof questions

Four ways to turn the Fontana dataset into a useful case plan

These prompts are built from the local crash mix, roads, intersections, causes, and insurance patterns above. They are designed to help a reader choose the next evidence step instead of treating the statistic as the answer.

First evidence priority

How to read the road detail around Cherry Ave & Baseline

The value of naming I-10 is practical. It tells the reader to separate public records, private footage, vehicle damage, and medical intake notes before the insurer turns the scene into a generic fault dispute.

Use the corridor to identify record holders, not to assume liability.

Fontana car accident guide

Cause dispute

How to use cause rankings without overclaiming

Speeding may lead the local list, but the claim still needs proof that it mattered in this collision. Useful records may include video, witness accounts, vehicle data, report language, or photos showing the point of impact.

Look for the neutral record before the insurer narrows the facts.

Review speeding crashes

Severity screen

How severity changes the next move

A serious injury file needs a chronology that starts before settlement language. Treatment dates, missed work, specialist referrals, and symptom changes should be organized while the crash details are still fresh.

Use the injury share as a triage signal, not as a value estimate.

Post-accident checklist

Coverage urgency

How to read the trend without waiting too long

7.6% pedestrian-crash share and 9.4% hit-and-run share point to the same practical issue: preserve identity, location, witness, and policy evidence quickly.

Compare the city FAQ if you need deadline and process questions.

Fontana accident FAQ

From research to action

How to use Fontana crash data after an injury

Citywide statistics explain the environment around a crash. A claim still turns on evidence, treatment, insurance coverage, and timing.

Use data for context

Start with 3,420 crashes, top causes, and dangerous corridors to understand the local risk picture.

Tie facts to evidence

Match the crash to roads like I-10, I-15, SR-210 and preserve photos, reports, and witnesses early.

Move before deadlines

If treatment, insurer statements, or filing windows are active, legal strategy should not wait for more research.

Top listed causes

The patterns most likely to shape a Fontana crash claim

Speeding

Truck Accidents

DUI

Distracted Driving

Reckless Driving

Next best pages

Where to go after reviewing Fontana crash data

These links connect the data page into the broader city, county, service, and resource cluster so readers have a clearer path forward.

Act on this city data

Move from Fontana crash context into legal guidance that matches the local injury pattern.

Primary city guide

Fontana car accident lawyers

How local crash patterns, roads, treatment, and insurance pressure shape a Fontana claim.

Broader injury help

Fontana personal injury lawyers

For crashes, premises injuries, severe injuries, and other claims tied to local evidence.

County comparison

San Bernardino County accident lawyers

Compare Fontana with the wider San Bernardino County litigation and highway context.

Use the research layer

Keep browsing if you are still comparing roads, nearby cities, or general next-step guidance.

Statewide hub

California accident statistics

Compare fatality rates, total crashes, and city-level risk across the statewide dataset.

Local FAQ

Fontana accident FAQ

Common local questions about crashes, claims, deadlines, and what to do next.

Immediate steps

What to do after a car accident

A practical checklist for treatment, photos, insurer calls, and evidence preservation.

Compare nearby cities

Review neighboring San Bernardino County city profiles before choosing the next page.

4,120 crashes

San Bernardino accident statistics

Crash totals, fatality rate, dangerous roads, and claim context for San Bernardino.

2,580 crashes

Rancho Cucamonga accident statistics

Crash totals, fatality rate, dangerous roads, and claim context for Rancho Cucamonga.

2,880 crashes

Ontario accident statistics

Crash totals, fatality rate, dangerous roads, and claim context for Ontario.

2,280 crashes

Victorville accident statistics

Crash totals, fatality rate, dangerous roads, and claim context for Victorville.

City accident statistics FAQ

Questions people ask before they move from data to next steps

How many car accidents occur in Fontana each year?

Fontana experiences approximately 3,420 traffic accidents annually, with 1,150 resulting in injuries and 32 being fatal.

What are the most dangerous intersections in Fontana?

The most dangerous intersections in Fontana include: Sierra Ave & Foothill, Cherry Ave & Baseline, Citrus Ave & Valley Blvd, Juniper Ave & Arrow Hwy. These locations see elevated accident rates due to traffic volume and design factors.

What is the fatality rate for Fontana traffic accidents?

Fontana has a traffic fatality rate of 14.9 per 100,000 population, compared to the California state average of 10.9.

What are the main causes of accidents in Fontana?

The top causes of car accidents in Fontana are: Speeding, Truck Accidents, DUI, Distracted Driving, Reckless Driving. Understanding these factors can help drivers stay safer on local roads and helps injury teams know what evidence to preserve first.

Use the data. Do not let the claim sit still.

If the crash happened in Fontana, Hurt Advice intake team can help connect the local facts to medical records, insurance coverage, and the evidence needed to move the claim forward.