Skip to main content
Referral intake reviewES
Action Guide

What to Do After an Intersection Accident

“Intersection accident” covers more than a red-light dispute. A left turn, right turn across a bicycle lane, stop sign, uncontrolled approach or blocked view can create different questions. Seek appropriate care and make an accurate incident report. Draw each road user’s approach and the control that applied to that approach before asking who had the right of way. The actual signal phase or sight line may remain unknown without an independent source.

Hurt Advice editorial guide. Source review: . This guide does not state that the attorney authored, reviewed or approved it. Visit the profile for public licensing and background records.

Review the attorney’s public background, then confirm experience and availability directly.

Raffi Naljian, Founder, Civil Litigation, Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Attorney

Raffi Naljian

Founder, Civil Litigation, Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Attorney

Raffi Garabed Naljian is the founder of Naljian Law Offices and an active California attorney under State Bar #238919. A Los Angeles Times profile says he founded the firm in 2008 after beginning his legal career in 1997, and the State Bar lists personal injury, litigation, criminal law, and business law among his self-reported practice areas.

View Raffi Naljian's full verified profile

Primary identity record

Learn more about Raffi Naljian

This is a focused supporting page. Use Raffi Naljian's full sourced attorney profile as the primary identity record for biography, role, languages, office information, and public-record links. Review that profile alongside the issue-specific preparation and public sources below.

The State Bar record lists Raffi Garabed Naljian as an active California attorney, State Bar #238919. Hurt Advice is a separate referral and legal information service, not the attorney's law firm.

How to Evaluate Attorney Fit for This Issue

A good case review identifies the precise traffic-control rule, each movement and the missing record that could resolve a conflict. Ask whether the police diagram reflects a direct observation, witness account or later inference, and who might hold relevant video or signal records.

Consultation worksheet

Intersection control worksheet

Map the actual approaches and label signal colors unknown when no source saw them.

There is no submit or save action. Copy your notes before leaving this page.

Which road, approach direction, lane and movement applied to each road user?

Which signal, arrow, sign or crosswalk controlled that approach? Was any view obstructed?

Which road agency controls signal timing, and who holds any dashcam or nearby business video?

What exactly do the accounts disagree about, and which independent source could answer it?

Sources for this guide

What to Do Next

  1. 1Address injuries and safety, then record the road names, direction, lane and travel movement of each vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian.
  2. 2Photograph signs, signals, turn arrows, stop lines, crosswalks, bike lanes and sight obstructions from safe positions.
  3. 3Get independent witnesses’ positions and identify cameras with a view of the approach rather than assuming every intersection camera records video.
  4. 4Request the investigating report and compare its diagram with the actual controls and witness accounts; check separate insurer and DMV duties.

Evidence Checklist

  • Approach sketch identifying turns, lanes, control devices and impact/rest positions
  • Photos of signal heads, signs, crosswalks, sight lines and any temporary change
  • Witness vantage points, original dashcam and named camera or signal-record custodians
  • Agency report, vehicle damage, care records and written insurer position

Keep your unanswered questions handy when comparing the attorney’s public profile with your needs.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Calling every broadside impact a red-light violation
  • Assuming a vehicle with a green light could ignore a person already lawfully crossing or another relevant rule
  • Treating a witness’s view of one signal as proof of the other approach’s phase
  • Requesting traffic-signal timing data without identifying the intersection authority and relevant time

How the Process Typically Works

1

Classify the control

Determine whether the crash involved lights, arrows, signs or an uncontrolled approach.

2

Map each movement

Document approaches, turns, crossing paths and independent observer views.

3

Resolve the disputed fact

Compare video, report, witness accounts and applicable rules before evaluating claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a green light always resolve an intersection collision?

No. Movement, turn, pedestrian and other facts still matter. California DMV describes distinct right-of-way and turning rules; the actual control and behavior must be established.

What if both drivers report a green light?

Record their approaches and seek independent witnesses, relevant camera coverage or agency signal information. Do not turn either account into a fact without support.

Is this the same as a T-bone collision?

Some intersection crashes involve side impact, but this guide starts with traffic controls and conflicting approaches. The side-impact guide focuses on a particular contact pattern and its evidence.

Use the attorney’s public background as a starting point for a direct conversation about fit.

Related Resources

Free Intake Review

Share the basic facts and request help identifying an independent attorney who may be relevant

Secure intake request

Send your name and one way to reach you now. Case details are optional.

Important Disclosures

Attorney Advertising. Hurt Advice is a lawyer-referral and legal-information service, not a law firm. This website provides general information, not legal advice. Viewing a page or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Independent participating attorneys decide whether to accept a matter, and representation begins only under a separate written agreement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results depend on the facts and circumstances of each matter.