Skip to main content
Referral intake reviewES
Timeline Guide

Discovery in an Injury Case: Process and Timing

Discovery is the formal exchange of information in a filed civil case. The first useful step is to list disputed facts and the records that could answer them. Requests directed to another party, depositions and subpoenas to a nonparty have different procedures. Each served document has its own response and objection questions, and the ordinary discovery cutoff is measured against the original trial date unless a controlling court order or qualifying written agreement changes it. Keep original evidence and a dated service log.

Hurt Advice editorial guide. Source review: . This guide does not state that the attorney authored, reviewed or approved it. Visit the profile for public licensing and background records.

Review the attorney’s public background, then confirm experience and availability directly.

Raffi Naljian, Founder, Civil Litigation, Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Attorney

Raffi Naljian

Founder, Civil Litigation, Personal Injury & Criminal Defense Attorney

Raffi Garabed Naljian is the founder of Naljian Law Offices and an active California attorney under State Bar #238919. A Los Angeles Times profile says he founded the firm in 2008 after beginning his legal career in 1997, and the State Bar lists personal injury, litigation, criminal law, and business law among his self-reported practice areas.

View Raffi Naljian's full verified profile

Primary identity record

Learn more about Raffi Naljian

This is a focused supporting page. Use Raffi Naljian's full sourced attorney profile as the primary identity record for biography, role, languages, office information, and public-record links. Review that profile alongside the issue-specific preparation and public sources below.

The State Bar record lists Raffi Garabed Naljian as an active California attorney, State Bar #238919. Hurt Advice is a separate referral and legal information service, not the attorney's law firm.

How to Evaluate Attorney Fit for This Issue

Ask why a proposed request or deposition matters, who controls the record and whether the person is a party. A lawyer should explain response scope, privacy, objections and expense from the actual papers. Neither a generic 30-day response statement nor a predicted discovery phase length replaces the specific method, service date, court order or agreement confirmed in writing.

Consultation worksheet

Discovery request and response tracker

Use one row per item, not one deadline for the entire case. Dates depend on the discovery method, service, special notice and court orders.

There is no submit or save action. Copy your notes before leaving this page.

Which disputed fact will this record or testimony address, and what original evidence already exists?

Is the holder a party, witness, provider, employer or other nonparty, and what method fits?

What was served, when and how, with what proof and any advance notice requirement?

What deadline applies to this exact paper, and what answer, objection or production was received?

What follow-up, meet-and-confer, motion or cutoff issue remains, and which order or written agreement controls?

Sources for this guide

What to Do Next

  1. 1List each disputed fact and the original records already held; preserve those records and identify who controls the missing material.
  2. 2Choose the appropriate party discovery method or nonparty subpoena for each missing item, including extra notice where required for protected records.
  3. 3For every received paper, record the method and date of service, applicable response or objection rule and responsible person.
  4. 4Track responses, meet-and-confer issues, motions and the court’s original trial-date cutoff; review any order or agreement confirmed in writing that changes the schedule.

Evidence Checklist

  • Pleadings, trial-setting notice and discovery or scheduling orders
  • Original evidence index with source and preservation location
  • Requests, subpoenas, notices, service proofs, responses and objections
  • Meet-and-confer letters, motion orders and a method-specific deadline log

Keep your unanswered questions handy when comparing the attorney’s public profile with your needs.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Treating a subpoena to a nonparty like an interrogatory to a party
  • Assuming every request has the same service or response period
  • Deleting, editing or hiding relevant originals, including online material
  • Assuming a trial continuance automatically reopens discovery

How the Process Typically Works

1

Pleadings and disputed facts

Use the filed issues to decide which evidence is needed and which original records must be protected.

2

Party and nonparty tools

Serve properly timed party requests or use subpoenas and any required advance notice for records held by others.

3

Response and dispute

Track the rule for each served document, review scope and objections, then address gaps through appropriate follow-up.

4

Pretrial cutoff

Check completion and motion dates against the original trial date. If later discovery is needed, verify a controlling court order or an affected-parties agreement confirmed in writing with the extended date.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I request documents directly from a nonparty in discovery?

California Courts distinguishes party discovery from subpoenas for nonparties. The proper subpoena process and possible advance notice depend on the records requested.

Do I always have 30 days to respond?

No universal period fits every method or service type. California Courts describes ordinary written-discovery response timing, but mail, court orders and other procedures may change the calculation. Review the actual papers promptly.

Does postponing trial automatically extend discovery?

Generally, no. Code of Civil Procedure section 2024.020 uses the original trial date for ordinary discovery cutoffs. A court can allow later discovery under section 2024.050, and section 2024.060 permits affected parties to agree to an extension or reopening when they confirm the extended date in writing. Neither route makes a trial continuance automatic.

Use the attorney’s public background as a starting point for a direct conversation about fit.

Related Resources

Free Intake Review

Share the basic facts and request help identifying an independent attorney who may be relevant

Secure intake request

Send your name and one way to reach you now. Case details are optional.

Important Disclosures

Attorney Advertising. Hurt Advice is a lawyer-referral and legal-information service, not a law firm. This website provides general information, not legal advice. Viewing a page or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Independent participating attorneys decide whether to accept a matter, and representation begins only under a separate written agreement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results depend on the facts and circumstances of each matter.