Berryessa is a northeast San Jose neighborhood with BART extension, flea market, and diverse dining. The goal is a practical local review: identify what happened near Berryessa BART, match it to treatment timing, and decide which proof should be preserved first.
3
Local road signals
2
Scene anchors
11,450
City crash context
8
Nearby areas
Attorney-fit questions
Compare local brain injury attorney and brain injury lawyer options while organizing the proof an attorney would need to evaluate. Hurt Advice provides legal information and case-routing intake, not law-firm representation.
Compare local attorneys alongside the scene, treatment, insurance, and fee questions each attorney would need to evaluate. Hurt Advice can organize the facts and route a case-review request to participating attorneys when appropriate.
Evaluate attorney fit using visible proof: streets, landmarks, treatment records, insurer pressure, and the next useful intake question.
Hurt Advice is a legal information and case-routing service, not a law firm. Legal representation only begins if a participating attorney and client sign a separate written agreement.
For brain injuries in Berryessa, San Jose, this section connects the scene near Berryessa BART, the Regional Medical Center chronology, and official-process questions associated with Old Courthouse. It also shows sources and bar-verified attorney profiles, but it does not replace investigation, diagnosis, or individualized legal advice; review the reported fact against the original document to mark the remaining gap.
How to use this evidence guide
Official local record brief
City of San Jose Department of Transportation publishes traffic crash dashboards and vision zero planning records; here it is connected with I-280 near Berryessa BART, and the visible limit controls what may be concluded.
City of San Jose Department of Transportation
The city page links all-crash and killed-or-severely-injured dashboards, the 2025 action plan, and its Priority Safety Corridor map. On this page, the record helps separate Berryessa, San Jose public context from incident-specific proof and the Regional Medical Center chronology; review the local signal against the source boundary to test whether independent records agree.
When to use it
Use this source to distinguish citywide crash patterns and planning corridors from the facts and records of one San Jose incident; compare local context against incident-level proof to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
Details used to locate the record
Limit: Dashboard trends and corridor designations are public-safety context, not evidence that a road condition or person caused a particular crash; for this brain injuries page, compare the published scope with I-280 and the Regional Medical Center chronology before applying it to the incident.
City of San Jose Police Department
The department explains authorized access under Vehicle Code section 20012, online, mail, and in-person request routes, report timing, exceptions, and the identifiers needed to locate a report. On this page, the record helps separate Berryessa, San Jose public context from incident-specific proof and the Regional Medical Center chronology; review the public record against its source limitation to keep the chronology auditable.
When to use it
Use this page when SJPD investigated the collision and an eligible party needs the report or must identify an online-release exception; review the unresolved question against the confirming record to keep the chronology auditable.
Details used to locate the record
Limit: The process covers qualifying SJPD reports inside San Jose and does not establish jurisdiction over freeways, neighboring cities, private records, liability, medical causation, or damages; for this brain injuries page, compare the published scope with I-280 and the Regional Medical Center chronology before applying it to the incident.
Local anchors and boundaries
Scene anchor
Use the direction, lane, crossing, time, and observed conditions to identify reports, cameras, and witnesses connected with I-280; reconcile the record owner against the preservation step to show what needs confirmation.
Boundary: Berryessa BART is a geographic reference; it does not establish where an incident occurred or who was at fault; cross-check the statement against the timestamped record to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
First-care record
Compare triage, imaging, referrals, restrictions, and billing from Regional Medical Center with the incident chronology; trace the public record against its source limitation to separate assumptions from documented facts.
Boundary: Naming Regional Medical Center does not confirm that a person received care there or that its records prove causation; document the published profile against the official license to keep the chronology auditable.
Official path
Confirm the entity, legal party names, and published process before using Old Courthouse for a filing or venue question; document the source scope against the supported conclusion to preserve the original sequence.
Boundary: Old Courthouse is a research reference and does not establish venue, jurisdiction, or an individual deadline; map the unresolved question against the confirming record to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
Local mobility
Check whether agency, station, vehicle, or transfer records help place the sequence near I-280; document the factual issue against the next available custodian to test one unresolved fact.
Boundary: VTA (Light Rail & Bus) and Caltrain may identify an agency or movement record, but confirm the operator, time window, and record number before using it to describe this incident; map the page claim against primary evidence to preserve the original sequence.
Visual evidence flow
For this page, start at I-280 near Berryessa BART, compare the chronology tied to Regional Medical Center, and confirm whether City of San Jose Department of Transportation controls traffic crash dashboards and vision zero planning records; the final step checks Silva Maranjyan's published license without assigning representation.
01 / Scene
I-280 near Berryessa BART
Record the time, direction, lane, and possible camera or witness leads tied to I-280 near Berryessa BART.
02 / Care
Regional Medical Center
Compare first symptoms, triage, referrals, and restrictions in records associated with Regional Medical Center.
03 / Record
City of San Jose Department of Transportation
Confirm whether City of San Jose Department of Transportation controls traffic crash dashboards and vision zero planning records before requesting it.
04 / Review
Silva Maranjyan
Check Silva Maranjyan's published license and practice information; this path does not assign an attorney.
Decision path
Record direction, time, conditions, and the Berryessa BART reference, then identify who controls the report, video, or physical record; trace the evidence sequence against the retention window to mark the remaining gap.
Order symptoms, triage, diagnosis, imaging, referrals, and restrictions by date without assuming one note resolves causation; reconcile the record request against the responsible custodian to separate assumptions from documented facts.
Record who observed each change and when; medical diagnosis and urgent-care decisions belong to qualified clinicians; track the Vision Zero San Jose crash data and priority corridors request to City of San Jose Department of Transportation as requested, received, disputed, or still awaiting primary-source confirmation; review the source scope against the supported conclusion to mark the remaining gap.
Verify parties, public-entity involvement, venue, and dates through an official source or qualified attorney before relying on a general deadline; compare the claimed fact against the verifying document to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
Investigating agency and camera custodian
On the I-280 approach near Berryessa BART, record direction, lane, crossing, time, and lighting. If first care began at Regional Medical Center, compare its intake time with dispatch, video, and movement data to identify who holds each missing record; trace the claimed fact against the verifying document to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
Next request: For this brain injuries review, obtain the report number and preserve video, dispatch, photographs, and movement data before routine deletion cycles; cross-check the source scope against the supported conclusion to check who controlled the evidence.
Medical provider and records department
For care attributed to Regional Medical Center, separate triage, diagnosis, imaging, referrals, restrictions, billing, and symptom changes. The Regional Medical Center chart does not prove causation by itself; it shows which dates and changes still need qualified review; review the record request against the responsible custodian to distinguish context from proof.
Next request: Request the complete Regional Medical Center chart and keep a dated list of missing, corrected, or later-added records; cross-check the factual issue against the next available custodian to check who controlled the evidence.
Court, city, county, or public entity
For a filing or public-entity question linked to Old Courthouse, first identify who controlled the scene or key record. Confirm the official path associated with Old Courthouse before assuming the ordinary filing period resolves a possible public-claim notice; verify the local signal against the source boundary to mark the remaining gap.
Next request: Identify the potential defendant, then use the published court or agency path associated with Old Courthouse before waiting; map the scene fact against the preserved record to distinguish context from proof.
Brain Injuries specialist record holder
For brain injuries in Berryessa, San Jose, the focused review should include impact mechanics, immediate observations, emergency notes, imaging, referrals, symptom progression, work or school effects, and family observations. Compare that file with the first-care chronology from Regional Medical Center and any venue question involving Old Courthouse; the central unresolved issue is whether the chronology connects an objective event with changing cognitive, balance, sleep, pain, or functional symptoms without overstating diagnosis; review the timeline against independent corroboration to show what needs confirmation.
Next request: Record who observed each change and when; medical diagnosis and urgent-care decisions belong to qualified clinicians for the file connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; reconcile the filing question against official authority to test one unresolved fact.
Local data classification
Editorial estimateHurt Advice's illustrative city model lists 11,450 crashes for San Jose, including 3,890 injury crashes; no neighborhood frequency is inferred from the city total.
This figure is a Hurt Advice editorial model, not an official agency extract or proof of fault, block-level frequency, or claim value.
Analysis before conclusions
Start with direction, lane, crossing, time, lighting, and the Berryessa BART reference. Then connect those details with first care from Regional Medical Center and the custodian of each report, video, or record; verify the claimed fact against the verifying document to tie the request to a named source.
Hurt Advice's illustrative city model lists 11,450 crashes for San Jose, including 3,890 injury crashes; no neighborhood frequency is inferred from the city total. This figure is a Hurt Advice editorial model, not an official agency extract or proof of fault, block-level frequency, or claim value; map the page claim against primary evidence to check who controlled the evidence.
For brain injuries in Berryessa, San Jose, this page links Silva Maranjyan (published focus includes brain injury, catastrophic injury, serious injury); Armen Akaragian (published focus includes catastrophic injury, serious injury) as comparison paths grounded in public profiles and license records; it does not imply assignment, availability, representation, or an outcome recommendation; cross-check the statement against the timestamped record to mark the remaining gap.
Compare the report, dispatch, photograph, or video time near Berryessa BART with the first note from Regional Medical Center. A timing difference does not decide the matter, but it identifies which custodian or witness should clarify the sequence; map the treatment chronology against the provider record to check who controlled the evidence.
Confirm the legal name of each potential party, who controlled I-280, and whether a public entity was involved. Old Courthouse is a local reference; it does not establish venue, jurisdiction, or compliance with a notice requirement by itself; compare the coverage position against the policy document to tie the request to a named source.
The file should connect impact mechanics, immediate observations, emergency notes, imaging, referrals, symptom progression, work or school effects, and family observations with the Regional Medical Center chronology and evidence preserved near Berryessa BART. That comparison helps evaluate whether the chronology connects an objective event with changing cognitive, balance, sleep, pain, or functional symptoms without overstating diagnosis without turning local context into a legal conclusion; verify the public record against its source limitation to test one unresolved fact.
San Jose cases often require documenting tech-shuttle movement, employer transportation issues, and high-income wage-loss claims tied to Silicon Valley work patterns; trace the scene fact against the preserved record to keep the chronology auditable.
Treatment records often begin with providers such as Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and Regional Medical Center before moving into orthopedic, neuro, and pain-management care. Preserving that timeline is critical to proving damages in San Jose; reconcile the factual issue against the next available custodian to show what needs confirmation.
Review should compare witnesses, camera coverage, and treatment locations with filing venues near Santa Clara County Superior Court and Hall of Justice, especially for crashes tied to SAP Center, Winchester Mystery House and ZIP codes such as 95110, 95112, 95113; compare the record chronology against the chain of custody to test whether independent records agree.
Preserve incident, camera, or business footage near SAP Center, Winchester Mystery House; Lock in EMS and intake records from Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and Regional Medical Center; Track witness movement and vehicle data on corridors like US-101, I-280; Tie liability themes to local causes such as Speeding, Distracted Driving; review the public record against its source limitation to preserve the original sequence.
Heavy movement through US-101, I-280; Recurring danger at intersections such as Story Rd & King Rd, Capitol Expy & Monterey Rd; Higher claim pressure during 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM, 5:00 PM - 7:00 PM; compare the timeline against independent corroboration to keep the chronology auditable.
Verified attorney relevance
No match guarantees assignment, representation, or results.
Primary source trail
The city page links all-crash and killed-or-severely-injured dashboards, the 2025 action plan, and its Priority Safety Corridor map; on this page it locates the local record connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; document the source statement against the supporting record to preserve the original sequence.
Limit: Dashboard trends and corridor designations are public-safety context, not evidence that a road condition or person caused a particular crash; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
The department explains authorized access under Vehicle Code section 20012, online, mail, and in-person request routes, report timing, exceptions, and the identifiers needed to locate a report; on this page it locates the local record connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; verify the reported fact against the original document to test one unresolved fact.
Limit: The process covers qualifying SJPD reports inside San Jose and does not establish jurisdiction over freeways, neighboring cities, private records, liability, medical causation, or damages; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official city and county traffic-safety context, methodology, and limitations; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; document the claimed fact against the verifying document to keep the chronology auditable.
Limit: OTS rankings compare incorporated cities or counties and do not prove what happened at a particular scene; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official tool for locating the relevant county court and its public contact information; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; review the incident detail against the public source to check who controlled the evidence.
Limit: The court finder locates courts; it does not select venue or calculate a filing deadline for an individual matter; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Primary statutory text for the general two-year personal-injury action period; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; cross-check the treatment chronology against the provider record to test one unresolved fact.
Limit: Exceptions, accrual rules, contract terms, public-entity claims, and other laws may change the applicable deadline; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Primary statutory text for specified claims presented to a public entity; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; trace the filing question against official authority to test one unresolved fact.
Limit: The statute does not identify whether a defendant is a public entity or whether another presentation rule applies; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Federal health information about TBI symptoms, danger signs, and medical follow-up; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; reconcile the local signal against the source boundary to preserve the original sequence.
Limit: General health information is not a diagnosis and cannot connect symptoms to a particular event; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Site disclosure identifying editorial estimates, public-source families, and citation boundaries; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; map local context against incident-level proof to test one unresolved fact.
Limit: An editorial estimate is not an official agency extract and cannot prove incident-level frequency, fault, or claim value; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official public source for checking a California attorney name, license number, and status; on this page it frames the investigation connecting I-280, Regional Medical Center, and Old Courthouse; map the page claim against primary evidence to mark the remaining gap.
Limit: A license record verifies public registration details; it does not establish case fit, availability, or likely outcome; for this brain injuries issue in Berryessa, San Jose, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Neighborhood strategy
Berryessa claims deserve a narrower evidence review when Capitol Avenue, Berryessa BART, and Regional Medical Center can each answer a different part of the timeline. Organize what happened, who may hold records, and where the next document request belongs.
The first review asks which record can prove the sequence: a camera or witness near Berryessa Road, a business or public-agency record near Berryessa BART, or a treatment note from Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.
When berryessa bart tbi proof window appears in a Berryessa file, the first pass should connect Berryessa Road, Berryessa BART, and the earliest provider note.
Berryessa BART TBI proof window should be checked alongside Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and Regional Medical Center so the medical timeline stays connected to the scene.
Focus on Berryessa Road and Capitol Avenue when those details answer a narrower evidence question than the broader San Jose facts.
Local context in Berryessa
Berryessa is a northeast San Jose neighborhood with BART extension, flea market, and diverse dining.
Citywide crash context for San Jose: about 22,000+ reported collisions a year, 18,000+ with injuries and 60+ fatal (citywide totals, not neighborhood-level).
Major routes serving San Jose: I-880, I-280, US-101, CA-87, CA-85.
Attorney review preparation
These steps organize the local claim around visible records, practical questions, and verified attorney information.
Step 1
Identify the closest street, intersection, business, landmark, or camera lead near Berryessa Road.
Step 2
Match the first symptoms with treatment records from Santa Clara Valley Medical Center or another provider.
Step 3
Save claim numbers, adjuster messages, recorded-statement requests, repair photos, and witness names before responding in detail.
Step 4
Use the local proof packet to decide whether the next step is a resource guide, the broader San Jose page, or a participating-attorney review request.
Local scene signals
Local details support three immediate decisions: preserve a scene record, connect the first treatment note, or move from research into case review.
Entertainment areas create short bursts of congestion where crowd flow, alcohol service, valet movement, and rideshare pickups can matter.
Save event timing, receipts, app-trip records, nearby camera locations, and any security or venue incident report numbers.
A head-injury file should separate the local scene around Capitol Avenue, early symptoms, family observations, provider notes from Regional Medical Center, and insurer pressure before symptoms are minimized.
Save ER notes, imaging orders, discharge papers, medication lists, family observations, and symptom changes tied to the first days after Capitol Avenue.
Berryessa brain injuries claims should connect the approach on Berryessa Road, the local anchor near Berryessa Flea Market, first symptoms, and treatment at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center.
Compare Berryessa Road, Hostetter Road, Berryessa Flea Market, and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center to decide which record needs preservation first.
Treatment records from Santa Clara Valley Medical Center or Regional Medical Center can help tie symptoms to the local incident timeline.
Keep discharge papers, imaging orders, referral notes, prescriptions, and missed-work records together from the first visit.
Local evidence matrix
Each card connects a local route, scene anchor, treatment record, and concrete evidence task. Open the checks that fit the facts; not every item applies to every claim.
Mobility-impact lens check 1
If delayed symptom escalation appears, the first review should compare Berryessa BART, coverage map, and Good Samaritan Hospital before damages are estimated.
Show stepsProvider-handoff lens check 2
rideshare trip screen, O'Connor Hospital, and weather and lighting change are useful when they help someone decide what to preserve before contacting anyone.
Show stepsBilingual-intake lens check 3
The bilingual-intake lens matters here because Berryessa Flea Market and Rose Garden can point to different record owners, different witnesses, and different timing pressure.
Show stepsFault-sequence lens check 4
A useful first review asks whether property incident note or dash-camera export can prove turning a broad injury question into a document-specific checklist before the brain injuries file loses its local record sequence.
Show stepsCamera-window lens check 5
radiology order, O'Connor Hospital, and freight movement are useful when they help someone decide what to preserve before contacting anyone.
Show stepsRecord-preservation lens check 6
Instead of repeating statewide basics, test whether Hostetter Road, property incident note, and prioritizing the records that change liability, treatment, or damages change the next useful step.
Show stepsBilingual-intake lens check 7
Start this street-level review with radiology order, not a settlement estimate, because a provider handoff that needs chronology can change how Capitol Avenue is read against O'Connor Hospital.
Show stepsMobility-impact lens check 8
call-log timestamp, O'Connor Hospital, and hospital transfer timing are useful when they help someone decide what to preserve before contacting anyone.
Show stepsBrain-injury-specific local review
Preserve imaging orders, identify any memory-symptom dispute, and connect the first medical note before the insurer summary separates symptoms from the incident.
Impact sequence
The first useful question near Berryessa Road is whether impact force, head movement, or witness observations explain why post-concussion symptom note appeared when it did.
Symptom chronology
The timeline should not depend on memory alone; it should use appointment dates, messages, family notes, and the EMS narrative to show progression.
Medical custody
A narrow Berryessa request should ask who can verify the incident mechanics, who saw the person afterward, and whether the EMS narrative matches the symptom sequence.
Referral path
A brain injury review should connect the EMS narrative with post-concussion symptom note, follow-up restrictions, and any neurology, imaging, or therapy referral path that starts near Regional Medical Center.
Causation response
A local answer to causation should explain whether incident mechanics, the record window, or the treatment sequence changes the way responsibility is evaluated.
Local comparison
If the route crosses toward Sunnyvale, the useful comparison is whether witnesses, providers, or record owners change across the neighborhood line.
11,450
Total crashes
3,890
Injury crashes
890
Pedestrian crashes
6.1/100K
Fatality rate
Citywide patterns do not prove what happened in one claim, but they help identify the roads, timing, and evidence requests that should be checked early.
Next useful clicks
Compare the city service guide, city hub, local crash data, and nearby neighborhoods based on the next question in your claim.
Use broader city guidance when neighborhood facts need to be checked against citywide claim strategy.
City service
San Jose Brain Injuries
Review San Jose Brain Injuries for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
City hub
San Jose injury hub
Review San Jose injury hub for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
Crash data
San Jose crash data
Review San Jose crash data for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
FAQ
San Jose accident FAQ
Review San Jose accident FAQ for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
Compare Berryessa with adjacent local pages when the scene, hospital, or witness path crosses neighborhood lines.
Nearby area
Japantown Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Japantown's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Evergreen Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Evergreen's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Rose Garden Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Rose Garden's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Almaden Valley Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Almaden Valley's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Cambrian Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Cambrian's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Los Gatos Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Los Gatos's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Silver Creek Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Silver Creek's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Campbell Brain Injuries
Review the same legal issue through Campbell's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Use these evergreen guides when the next step is evidence organization, insurance communication, or lawyer selection.
City TBI guide
San Jose brain injury guide
Compare this Berryessa symptom-proof path with the broader San Jose brain injury and TBI attorney review page.
Statewide TBI guide
California brain injury guide
Review statewide traumatic brain injury guidance, concussion symptoms, treatment records, long-term damages, and case-routing context.
TBI value factors
Traumatic brain injury settlement calculator
Use the TBI calculator after symptom proof, treatment depth, wage loss, future care, and insurance coverage have been organized.
Legal definition
Traumatic brain injury definition
Review how traumatic brain injury terminology is used in legal and medical-record discussions.
Concussion comparison
TBI vs concussion comparison
Compare concussion and traumatic brain injury symptoms, proof problems, treatment timelines, and claim-value questions.
Claim value factors
Brain injury claim value factors
Review how TBI claim value can depend on symptoms, care continuity, work impact, future care, and proof quality.
Checklist
What to do after an accident
A step-by-step evidence checklist for the first hours after an injury event.
Insurance
How to file an insurance claim
A practical guide for organizing insurance notices, documents, and recorded-statement decisions.
Lawyer fit
How to find a personal injury lawyer
Questions to ask before choosing someone to evaluate local proof and medical documentation.
Value factors
Settlement calculator
Compare injury severity, treatment time, insurance pressure, and damages before estimating claim value.
Treatment
Medical care after an accident
Find medical-care context that helps connect symptoms, providers, referrals, and follow-up records.
Fees
Personal injury lawyer cost
Understand contingency fees, case costs, and what written-fee-terms means before hiring counsel.
A Berryessa brain injuries intake review can start with repair documentation, Regional Medical Center, and whether Capitol Avenue creates an evidence deadline. Any attorney fee, cost, or contingency term depends on a separate written attorney agreement.
Use Capitol Avenue and Hostetter Road as the roadway anchors, then connect photos, witness names, and first care at Good Samaritan Hospital. That combination helps separate local proof from a broad brain injuries overview.
The calendar for a neighborhood brain injuries file depends less on a generic average and more on commercial-vehicle records. Use the 12-36 months benchmark as a planning range while you preserve high-friction records while the case is still fresh.
Save the closest street, nearby business or camera location, report number, treatment date, and carrier contact. A Berryessa file is stronger when the scene record and care record tell the same timeline.
San Jose context is helpful, but Berryessa can have different witnesses, traffic flow, cameras, and medical handoffs. Separating those details makes the next evidence step clearer.
No. Hurt Advice is a legal information and case-routing service, not a law firm. The intake can help organize Berryessa brain injuries facts and, when appropriate, route the request to participating attorneys. No attorney-client relationship begins unless a separate written agreement is signed with an attorney.