The Marina is an affluent waterfront neighborhood with busy Chestnut Street shops and Palace of Fine Arts traffic. The goal is a practical local review: identify what happened near Palace of Fine Arts, match it to treatment timing, and decide which proof should be preserved first.
4
Local road signals
4
Scene anchors
8,920
City crash context
8
Nearby areas
Attorney-fit questions
Compare local pedestrian accident attorney and pedestrian accident lawyer options while organizing the proof an attorney would need to evaluate. Hurt Advice provides legal information and case-routing intake, not law-firm representation.
Compare local attorneys alongside the scene, treatment, insurance, and fee questions each attorney would need to evaluate. Hurt Advice can organize the facts and route a case-review request to participating attorneys when appropriate.
Evaluate attorney fit using visible proof: streets, landmarks, treatment records, insurer pressure, and the next useful intake question.
Hurt Advice is a legal information and case-routing service, not a law firm. Legal representation only begins if a participating attorney and client sign a separate written agreement.
For pedestrian accidents in Marina District, San Francisco, this section connects the scene near Marina Green, the UCSF Medical Center chronology, and official-process questions associated with Hall of Justice. It also shows sources and bar-verified attorney profiles, but it does not replace investigation, diagnosis, or individualized legal advice; compare the record chronology against the chain of custody to distinguish context from proof.
How to use this evidence guide
Official local record brief
City and County of San Francisco publishes traffic-safety benchmarking dashboards and methodology; here it is connected with CA-1 near Marina Green, and the visible limit controls what may be concluded.
City and County of San Francisco
The city explains its injury, fatality, speed, citation, transit, and street-network metrics, comparison cities, source notes, and interpretation limits. On this page, the record helps separate Marina District, San Francisco public context from incident-specific proof and the UCSF Medical Center chronology; map the timeline against independent corroboration to test one unresolved fact.
When to use it
Use this source to understand the definitions and limits behind San Francisco traffic-safety comparisons before repeating a citywide benchmark; verify the filing question against official authority to separate assumptions from documented facts.
Details used to locate the record
Limit: The city cautions that benchmarking is not causal research and that reporting methods differ. It cannot establish incident-level fault or damages; for this pedestrian accidents page, compare the published scope with CA-1 and the UCSF Medical Center chronology before applying it to the incident.
San Francisco Department of Public Health and Police Department
The official dataset describes injury collisions from SFPD, historical Crossroads records, and CHP SWITRS sources, with collision-level fields, source periods, update dates, and methodology notes. On this page, the record helps separate Marina District, San Francisco public context from incident-specific proof and the UCSF Medical Center chronology; reconcile the scene fact against the preserved record to check who controlled the evidence.
When to use it
Use this source to verify injury-crash field definitions, source-system periods, and the date of the latest published San Francisco extract; review the page claim against primary evidence to preserve the original sequence.
Details used to locate the record
Limit: The dataset is limited to recorded injury crashes, may change as source systems update, and does not establish legal fault, public-entity notice, medical causation, insurance coverage, or damages; for this pedestrian accidents page, compare the published scope with CA-1 and the UCSF Medical Center chronology before applying it to the incident.
San Francisco Police Department
SFPD explains that its incident-report portal accepts requests for traffic-collision and other incident reports, lets requesters track a request, and delivers available reports and correspondence through a secure account. On this page, the record helps separate Marina District, San Francisco public context from incident-specific proof and the UCSF Medical Center chronology; trace the coverage position against the policy document to show what needs confirmation.
When to use it
Use this process after confirming that SFPD took the collision report and preserving enough incident details to identify the correct record; review the record chronology against the chain of custody to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
Details used to locate the record
Limit: The process applies to SFPD incident reports and does not establish that SFPD investigated an event, that a report is immediately available or fully releasable, or who is legally responsible; for this pedestrian accidents page, compare the published scope with CA-1 and the UCSF Medical Center chronology before applying it to the incident.
Local anchors and boundaries
Scene anchor
Use the direction, lane, crossing, time, and observed conditions to identify reports, cameras, and witnesses connected with CA-1; review the filing question against official authority to identify the next custodian.
Boundary: Marina Green is a geographic reference; it does not establish where an incident occurred or who was at fault; cross-check the timeline against independent corroboration to test whether independent records agree.
First-care record
Compare triage, imaging, referrals, restrictions, and billing from UCSF Medical Center with the incident chronology; document local context against incident-level proof to test whether independent records agree.
Boundary: Naming UCSF Medical Center does not confirm that a person received care there or that its records prove causation; cross-check the statement against the timestamped record to mark the remaining gap.
Official path
Confirm the entity, legal party names, and published process before using Hall of Justice for a filing or venue question; document the factual issue against the next available custodian to preserve the original sequence.
Boundary: Hall of Justice is a research reference and does not establish venue, jurisdiction, or an individual deadline; map the page claim against primary evidence to check who controlled the evidence.
Local mobility
Check whether agency, station, vehicle, or transfer records help place the sequence near CA-1; map the record chronology against the chain of custody to separate assumptions from documented facts.
Boundary: SF Muni (Metro & Bus) and BART may identify an agency or movement record, but confirm the operator, time window, and record number before using it to describe this incident; verify the claimed fact against the verifying document to tie the request to a named source.
Visual evidence flow
For this page, start at CA-1 near Marina Green, compare the chronology tied to UCSF Medical Center, and confirm whether City and County of San Francisco controls traffic-safety benchmarking dashboards and methodology; the final step checks Abraham Chuljyan's published license without assigning representation.
01 / Scene
CA-1 near Marina Green
Record the time, direction, lane, and possible camera or witness leads tied to CA-1 near Marina Green.
02 / Care
UCSF Medical Center
Compare first symptoms, triage, referrals, and restrictions in records associated with UCSF Medical Center.
03 / Record
City and County of San Francisco
Confirm whether City and County of San Francisco controls traffic-safety benchmarking dashboards and methodology before requesting it.
04 / Review
Abraham Chuljyan
Check Abraham Chuljyan's published license and practice information; this path does not assign an attorney.
Decision path
Record direction, time, conditions, and the Marina Green reference, then identify who controls the report, video, or physical record; compare the source scope against the supported conclusion to preserve the original sequence.
Order symptoms, triage, diagnosis, imaging, referrals, and restrictions by date without assuming one note resolves causation; cross-check the claimed fact against the verifying document to distinguish context from proof.
Document the full approach and signal sequence, not only the point where the pedestrian came to rest; track the San Francisco traffic crashes resulting in injury dataset request to San Francisco Department of Public Health and Police Department as requested, received, disputed, or still awaiting primary-source confirmation; trace the reported fact against the original document to distinguish context from proof.
Verify parties, public-entity involvement, venue, and dates through an official source or qualified attorney before relying on a general deadline; cross-check the source statement against the supporting record to identify the next custodian.
Investigating agency and camera custodian
On the CA-1 approach near Marina Green, record direction, lane, crossing, time, and lighting. If first care began at UCSF Medical Center, compare its intake time with dispatch, video, and movement data to identify who holds each missing record; verify the source statement against the supporting record to tie the request to a named source.
Next request: For this pedestrian accidents review, obtain the report number and preserve video, dispatch, photographs, and movement data before routine deletion cycles; cross-check the reported fact against the original document to mark the remaining gap.
Medical provider and records department
For care attributed to UCSF Medical Center, separate triage, diagnosis, imaging, referrals, restrictions, billing, and symptom changes. The UCSF Medical Center chart does not prove causation by itself; it shows which dates and changes still need qualified review; verify the claimed fact against the verifying document to identify the next custodian.
Next request: Request the complete UCSF Medical Center chart and keep a dated list of missing, corrected, or later-added records; document the source scope against the supported conclusion to test whether independent records agree.
Court, city, county, or public entity
For a filing or public-entity question linked to Hall of Justice, first identify who controlled the scene or key record. Confirm the official path associated with Hall of Justice before assuming the ordinary filing period resolves a possible public-claim notice; map the treatment chronology against the provider record to mark the remaining gap.
Next request: Identify the potential defendant, then use the published court or agency path associated with Hall of Justice before waiting; verify the incident chronology against its supporting source to limit the conclusion to verified facts.
Pedestrian Accidents specialist record holder
For pedestrian accidents in Marina District, San Francisco, the focused review should include crosswalk position, signal phase, vehicle approach, lighting, sight lines, footwear or belongings, witness accounts, and nearby video. Compare that file with the first-care chronology from UCSF Medical Center and any venue question involving Hall of Justice; the central unresolved issue is whether driver attention, crossing control, turning movement, speed, lighting, accessibility, or roadway ownership explains the impact; map the local signal against the source boundary to test one unresolved fact.
Next request: Document the full approach and signal sequence, not only the point where the pedestrian came to rest for the file connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; compare the scene fact against the preserved record to distinguish context from proof.
Local data classification
Official local recordSFPD via DataSF reports 1,453 injury collisions for the Marina during 2005–2026.
The source scope, period, and geography limit what this record can establish; it does not prove fault or block-level frequency.
SFPD via DataSFAnalysis before conclusions
Start with direction, lane, crossing, time, lighting, and the Marina Green reference. Then connect those details with first care from UCSF Medical Center and the custodian of each report, video, or record; cross-check the record request against the responsible custodian to identify the next custodian.
SFPD via DataSF reports 1,453 injury collisions for the Marina during 2005–2026. The source scope, period, and geography limit what this record can establish; it does not prove fault or block-level frequency; cross-check the coverage position against the policy document to tie the request to a named source.
For pedestrian accidents in Marina District, San Francisco, this page links Abraham Chuljyan (published focus includes pedestrian accidents); Nina Garayan (published focus includes pedestrian accidents) as comparison paths grounded in public profiles and license records; it does not imply assignment, availability, representation, or an outcome recommendation; map the treatment chronology against the provider record to preserve the original sequence.
Compare the report, dispatch, photograph, or video time near Marina Green with the first note from UCSF Medical Center. A timing difference does not decide the matter, but it identifies which custodian or witness should clarify the sequence; verify the evidence gap against the available custodian list to keep the chronology auditable.
Confirm the legal name of each potential party, who controlled CA-1, and whether a public entity was involved. Hall of Justice is a local reference; it does not establish venue, jurisdiction, or compliance with a notice requirement by itself; reconcile the page claim against primary evidence to preserve the original sequence.
The file should connect crosswalk position, signal phase, vehicle approach, lighting, sight lines, footwear or belongings, witness accounts, and nearby video with the UCSF Medical Center chronology and evidence preserved near Marina Green. That comparison helps evaluate whether driver attention, crossing control, turning movement, speed, lighting, accessibility, or roadway ownership explains the impact without turning local context into a legal conclusion; compare the record chronology against the chain of custody to identify the next custodian.
San Francisco cases frequently raise public-transit, rideshare, and pedestrian-right-of-way issues, so SFMTA evidence and government-claim timing can be central; reconcile the factual issue against the next available custodian to separate assumptions from documented facts.
Treatment records often begin with providers such as UCSF Medical Center and Zuckerberg SF General Hospital before moving into orthopedic, neuro, and pain-management care. Preserving that timeline is critical to proving damages in San Francisco; review the record owner against the preservation step to show what needs confirmation.
Review should compare camera coverage, curb activity, and transit records around Market Street, SoMa, and downtown corridors before deciding how to frame venue and liability; cross-check the filing question against official authority to test one unresolved fact.
Preserve incident, camera, or business footage near Golden Gate Bridge, Alcatraz Island; Lock in EMS and intake records from UCSF Medical Center and Zuckerberg SF General Hospital; Track witness movement and vehicle data on corridors like US-101, I-80; Tie liability themes to local causes such as Distracted Driving, Pedestrian Right-of-Way Violations; review the record chronology against the chain of custody to mark the remaining gap.
Heavy movement through US-101, I-80; Recurring danger at intersections such as Market & Octavia, 6th & Market; Higher claim pressure during 8:30 AM - 10:00 AM, 5:00 PM - 7:30 PM; reconcile the statement against the timestamped record to test whether independent records agree.
Verified attorney relevance
No match guarantees assignment, representation, or results.
Primary source trail
The city explains its injury, fatality, speed, citation, transit, and street-network metrics, comparison cities, source notes, and interpretation limits; on this page it locates the local record connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; reconcile the unresolved question against the confirming record to tie the request to a named source.
Limit: The city cautions that benchmarking is not causal research and that reporting methods differ. It cannot establish incident-level fault or damages; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
The official dataset describes injury collisions from SFPD, historical Crossroads records, and CHP SWITRS sources, with collision-level fields, source periods, update dates, and methodology notes; on this page it locates the local record connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; trace the source scope against the supported conclusion to preserve the original sequence.
Limit: The dataset is limited to recorded injury crashes, may change as source systems update, and does not establish legal fault, public-entity notice, medical causation, insurance coverage, or damages; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
SFPD explains that its incident-report portal accepts requests for traffic-collision and other incident reports, lets requesters track a request, and delivers available reports and correspondence through a secure account; on this page it locates the local record connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; reconcile the page claim against primary evidence to test whether independent records agree.
Limit: The process applies to SFPD incident reports and does not establish that SFPD investigated an event, that a report is immediately available or fully releasable, or who is legally responsible; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official city and county traffic-safety context, methodology, and limitations; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; map the factual issue against the next available custodian to identify the next custodian.
Limit: OTS rankings compare incorporated cities or counties and do not prove what happened at a particular scene; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official instructions for eligible parties requesting a CHP collision report; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; reconcile the local signal against the source boundary to preserve the original sequence.
Limit: This process applies to CHP reports and does not establish that CHP investigated a particular incident; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official SR-1 reporting information and required record fields; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; compare the record owner against the preservation step to keep the chronology auditable.
Limit: An SR-1 is a reporting record, not a finding of fault or a substitute for a collision report; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official tool for locating the relevant county court and its public contact information; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; verify the timeline against independent corroboration to identify the next custodian.
Limit: The court finder locates courts; it does not select venue or calculate a filing deadline for an individual matter; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Primary statutory text for the general two-year personal-injury action period; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; reconcile the public record against its source limitation to identify the next custodian.
Limit: Exceptions, accrual rules, contract terms, public-entity claims, and other laws may change the applicable deadline; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Primary statutory text for specified claims presented to a public entity; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; map the unresolved question against the confirming record to keep the chronology auditable.
Limit: The statute does not identify whether a defendant is a public entity or whether another presentation rule applies; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official reported injury-collision count for the Marina during 2005–2026; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; compare the incident detail against the public source to separate assumptions from documented facts.
Limit: The measured reporting area may be broader than the named neighborhood and does not establish the facts of an individual incident; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Official public source for checking a California attorney name, license number, and status; on this page it frames the investigation connecting CA-1, UCSF Medical Center, and Hall of Justice; verify the factual issue against the next available custodian to distinguish context from proof.
Limit: A license record verifies public registration details; it does not establish case fit, availability, or likely outcome; for this pedestrian accidents issue in Marina District, San Francisco, verify the custodian, period, and geography before drawing a conclusion.
Neighborhood strategy
pedestrian accidents questions in Marina District may turn on Chestnut Street, Fillmore Street, and scene anchors like Chestnut Street. Connect roadway facts, treatment timing, and insurer pressure before the claim is summarized too broadly.
A strong Marina District file turns the scene into a checklist: street proof from Lombard Street, location proof around Palace of Fine Arts, and medical timing tied to UCSF Medical Center.
A useful Marina District review starts by separating the street record from the care record: Lombard Street explains the scene, while UCSF Medical Center helps anchor symptoms.
Event and late-night surges should be checked alongside UCSF Medical Center and Zuckerberg SF General Hospital so the medical timeline stays connected to the scene.
When the scene overlaps nearby areas, compare witness access, provider timing, and roadway proof before relying on citywide context alone.
Local context in Marina District
The Marina is an affluent waterfront neighborhood with busy Chestnut Street shops and Palace of Fine Arts traffic.
Reported injury collisions in the Marina: 1,453 (2005–2026). Source: SFPD via DataSF
Citywide crash context for San Francisco: about 18,000+ reported collisions a year, 14,000+ with injuries and 30+ fatal (citywide totals, not neighborhood-level).
Major routes serving San Francisco: I-80, US-101, I-280, CA-1.
Attorney review preparation
These steps organize the local claim around visible records, practical questions, and verified attorney information.
Step 1
Identify the closest street, intersection, business, landmark, or camera lead near Lombard Street.
Step 2
Match the first symptoms with treatment records from UCSF Medical Center or another provider.
Step 3
Save claim numbers, adjuster messages, recorded-statement requests, repair photos, and witness names before responding in detail.
Step 4
Use the local proof packet to decide whether the next step is a resource guide, the broader San Francisco page, or a participating-attorney review request.
Local scene signals
The goal is not another city-name swap. It is to show which Marina District streets, scene anchors, providers, and insurer pressure points can change the first review.
Beach and waterfront zones often mix visitors, cyclists, rideshare pickups, delivery vehicles, and distracted pedestrian crossings.
Preserve photos that show curb position, lighting, bike-lane markings, boardwalk access, or parking-lot exits.
Entertainment areas create short bursts of congestion where crowd flow, alcohol service, valet movement, and rideshare pickups can matter.
Save event timing, receipts, app-trip records, nearby camera locations, and any security or venue incident report numbers.
Pedestrian claims often depend on signal phase, driver line of sight, marked crossing location, lighting, and nearby camera angles.
Capture the signal sequence, crosswalk markings, curb ramps, streetlights, vehicle path, and where the first medical response happened.
Marina District pedestrian accidents claims should connect the approach on Lombard Street, the local anchor near Marina Green, first symptoms, and treatment at St. Francis Memorial Hospital.
Start with Lombard Street, Marina Green, and the first provider note so the review stays grounded in Marina District.
Local evidence matrix
Each card connects a local route, scene anchor, treatment record, and concrete evidence task. Open the checks that fit the facts; not every item applies to every claim.
Public-entity lens check 1
Start this street-level review with weather snapshot, not a settlement estimate, because a local road pattern that changes who may have seen the event can change how Lombard Street is read against Zuckerberg SF General Hospital.
Show stepsLocal-cluster lens check 2
The narrow issue is whether Marina Green, triage record, and hospital transfer timing explain the treatment bridge better than a general incident summary could.
Show stepsRecord-preservation lens check 3
Keep the review grounded by tying Broken Bones, California Pacific Medical Center, and construction detour to one local record question at a time.
Show stepsCare-continuity lens check 4
Instead of repeating statewide basics, test whether Fillmore Street, camera-retention request, and placing disputed evidence ahead of unsupported settlement language change the next useful step.
Show stepsTreatment-timeline lens check 5
Start this street-level review with adjuster voicemail, not a settlement estimate, because a location-specific record question that needs a named custodian can change how Fillmore Street is read against St. Francis Memorial Hospital.
Show stepsFamily-decision lens check 6
Start this street-level review with ambulance narrative, not a settlement estimate, because a recorded-statement request can change how Lombard Street is read against California Pacific Medical Center.
Show stepsClaim-value lens check 7
For Marina District, the useful split is practical: Marina Boulevard frames the scene, California Pacific Medical Center frames the body, and delayed symptom escalation frames the insurer response.
Show stepsProof-gap lens check 8
Use this local lens to keep the review practical: Fillmore Street, Nob Hill, and radiology order should each answer a different evidence question.
Show steps8,920
Total crashes
3,100
Injury crashes
1,450
Pedestrian crashes
3.5/100K
Fatality rate
Citywide patterns do not prove what happened in one claim, but they help identify the roads, timing, and evidence requests that should be checked early.
Next useful clicks
Compare the city service guide, city hub, local crash data, and nearby neighborhoods based on the next question in your claim.
Use broader city guidance when neighborhood facts need to be checked against citywide claim strategy.
City service
San Francisco Pedestrian Accidents
Review San Francisco Pedestrian Accidents for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
City hub
San Francisco injury hub
Review San Francisco injury hub for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
Crash data
San Francisco crash data
Review San Francisco crash data for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
FAQ
San Francisco accident FAQ
Review San Francisco accident FAQ for supporting local context before deciding the next step.
Compare Marina District with adjacent local pages when the scene, hospital, or witness path crosses neighborhood lines.
Nearby area
Nob Hill Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through Nob Hill's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
North Beach Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through North Beach's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Haight-Ashbury Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through Haight-Ashbury's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Mission District Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through Mission District's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Castro District Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through Castro District's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
SoMa Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through SoMa's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Pacific Heights Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through Pacific Heights's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Nearby area
Financial District Pedestrian Accidents
Review the same legal issue through Financial District's streets, landmarks, and local proof points.
Use these evergreen guides when the next step is evidence organization, insurance communication, or lawyer selection.
Checklist
What to do after an accident
A step-by-step evidence checklist for the first hours after an injury event.
Insurance
How to file an insurance claim
A practical guide for organizing insurance notices, documents, and recorded-statement decisions.
Lawyer fit
How to find a personal injury lawyer
Questions to ask before choosing someone to evaluate local proof and medical documentation.
Value factors
Settlement calculator
Compare injury severity, treatment time, insurance pressure, and damages before estimating claim value.
Treatment
Medical care after an accident
Find medical-care context that helps connect symptoms, providers, referrals, and follow-up records.
Fees
Personal injury lawyer cost
Understand contingency fees, case costs, and what written-fee-terms means before hiring counsel.
A person in Marina District can organize dispatch records, first medical records, and medical documentation before deciding whether to speak with a participating attorney about written fee terms.
Start with Lombard Street, Chestnut Street, and the closest scene anchor near Fort Mason. For a pedestrian accidents file, the useful question is who can confirm movement, lighting, lane position, or witness access before commercial-vehicle records changes the claim posture.
Timeline questions for pedestrian accidents cases should start with records, not guesses. In Marina District, liability reconstruction can slow the file unless the team can request records before routine deletion cycles early.
Save the closest street, nearby business or camera location, report number, treatment date, and carrier contact. A Marina District file is stronger when the scene record and care record tell the same timeline.
Keep the local review focused on evidence tasks rather than broad city facts. Compare scene proof, medical records, insurance pressure, and related guidance before deciding whether to request case review.
No. Hurt Advice is a legal information and case-routing service, not a law firm. The intake can help organize Marina District pedestrian accidents facts and, when appropriate, route the request to participating attorneys. No attorney-client relationship begins unless a separate written agreement is signed with an attorney.